Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Apparently Rhule spoke to Charlotte reporters

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

AU-panther Mentor

AU-panther

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Sounds like we might be moving away from the WCO base (haven't looked at McAdoo's past philosophy)

Ugh 😖

Just based on some quick searching, seems like his foundation is WCO:

Can Ben McAdoo Fix the Panthers Offense? - Sports Illustrated Carolina Panthers News, Analysis and More

How Ben McAdoo’s New Offense Will Fly | PFF News & Analysis | PFF

Do Panthers, Ben McAdoo have a potential fit in Jimmy Garoppolo? (usatoday.com)

Might just be some coach speak by Rhule, its not like a coach is going to admit we want to run sideways.  Coaches have a habit of telling fans what they want to hear.  

If we do end up going to more of a power based running attack, that might actually lower Linderbaum down our draft board.  A lot of the reports I've seen on him is that he is more suited for zone.  He definitely doesn't fit the "bigger" profile.

 

 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
24 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Just based on some quick searching, seems like his foundation is WCO:

Can Ben McAdoo Fix the Panthers Offense? - Sports Illustrated Carolina Panthers News, Analysis and More

How Ben McAdoo’s New Offense Will Fly | PFF News & Analysis | PFF

Do Panthers, Ben McAdoo have a potential fit in Jimmy Garoppolo? (usatoday.com)

Might just be some coach speak by Rhule, its not like a coach is going to admit we want to run sideways.  Coaches have a habit of telling fans what they want to hear.  

If we do end up going to more of a power based running attack, that might actually lower Linderbaum down our draft board.  A lot of the reports I've seen on him is that he is more suited for zone.  He definitely doesn't fit the "bigger" profile.

WCO was what I figured because that's the style we've run, but bigger, "downhill" linemen don't necessarily fit that sort of approach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

WCO was what I figured because that's the style we've run, but bigger, "downhill" linemen don't necessarily fit that sort of approach.

What’s even stranger is the stretch zone approach mainly in the gun Brady ran.

It really seems like he has no idea what to do on offense and it’s all just blah blah blah

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

"Building the team the right way"

Then why does Rhule still have roster control?

I think that means is make panic trades and piss poor QB choices one after the other, thats the "right way"....

 

I wish one of those years they took the "hard" way and fixed the god dam cap while stock piling picks. No more "redoing" over-rated players with contracts either, pick out the true young core and pay them with normal deals. Besides this blackhole cycle of trying to go .500 and even failing at that. Tiresome so tiresome. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, Chaos said:

I hate Rhule like he murdered family members

I definitely feel a lot different about Rhule than I did about Fox and Rivera at the end. Maybe it's because we actually had success under those other guys. Maybe it's because I actually respected them as people and didn't think they were lying their asses off every time they opened their mouth. Maybe a little bit of both.

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Ward 1, Hunter, maybe 2. Per McShay

      By MHS831 · Posted

      They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • KillerKat
      Playoff bound. Again.

      By KillerKat · Posted

      I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • TD alt
      DONOVAN EZEIRUAKU at 8?

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...