Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 33rd Team previews Panthers free agency


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Tagging Reddick would be dumb.  Very skilled pass rusher and seems like a solid leader, but we don't need him.  I'd rather see that money committed to the OL or hell, the safety position.  We really need a playmaking safety who can play over the top, allowing Chinn to drop down more.  

Gilmore isn't worth re-signing unless he's taking a huge discount, and why would he do that?

Jackson, I'm iffy about.  If all he wants is #2 CB money, then hell yeah.  I think he's a great corner to pair with Horn.  But anything more than that and it is a hard pass. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mage said:

Tagging Reddick would be dumb.  Very skilled pass rusher and seems like a solid leader, but we don't need him.  I'd rather see that money committed to the OL or hell, the safety position.  We really need a playmaking safety who can play over the top, allowing Chinn to drop down more.  

I'm not in favor of tagging Reddick...unless we were to switch to a 3-4 (which there's no indication we plan to do).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mage said:

Tagging Reddick would be dumb.  Very skilled pass rusher and seems like a solid leader, but we don't need him.  I'd rather see that money committed to the OL or hell, the safety position.  We really need a playmaking safety who can play over the top, allowing Chinn to drop down more.  

Gilmore isn't worth re-signing unless he's taking a huge discount, and why would he do that?

Jackson, I'm iffy about.  If all he wants is #2 CB money, then hell yeah.  I think he's a great corner to pair with Horn.  But anything more than that and it is a hard pass. 

Completely agree 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...