Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Everyone wants Rhule gone but, what if


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, PandaMan said:

McAdoo was a doodoo head coach but is a solid OC.  Tabor is a good ST hire.  He knows what kind of guys to use in the return game.  Erickson didn’t fumble this year (to my knowledge) which is a huge step up in for our PR’s, but Tabor should help find better returners.  We’ve actually hired guys with success at their respective positions.  
 

Are they world beaters?  Nah, but the hires have been surprisingly good considering Rhule’s probably gone in 2023 barring a total turnaround

Yea but Bears fans wanted Tabor out. Like you said he has connections to guys like Jakeem Grant, but he is okay at best. Not bad, but McaDoo is below average and none of the others are above average except the Oline coach, which honestly what was most important. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/15/2022 at 1:07 PM, WUnderhill said:

If I was a manager at Applebee’s and got a position managing a Michelin star restaurant and brought my line cooks from Applebee’s to be chefs at the Michelin star restaurant thinking I was some sort of genius reinventing the wheel, is any amount of coming to my senses going to fix that kind of stupid and arrogance? The problem is deeper than just being forced to hire better people after 2 years. It’s like when Gordon Ramsay goes to a restaurant on Kitchen Nightmares and spoon feeds them a road map to success and then a month after he leaves they’ve already fuged it up again.

I didn't like the Rhule hire from the beginning. A preacher's son was not what the Panthers needed. Then he hired Temple and Baylor staff. The deal was sealed when he made the statement about Derrick Brown's crucial offsides penalty in a game that he liked the enthusiasm Derrick displayed. WTF. Something only a college coach would say. We've had a college team for 2 years.

A tiger can't change its stripes and I'm afraid that's where Rhule is. We'll see where hiring NFL experienced coaches takes us but I'm expecting a rough 2022.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...