Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you have a heart you root for the Bengals, if you have a brain you bet on the Rams....


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

No fault of Joe Burrow but I am already tired of the media slob fest and as such am pulling for the Rams. Also, a Bengals win just furthers the gap between teams who have won a SB and ones who have not as it relates to the Panthers. Eventually we’re gonna be one of a very few teams left without one. It’s annoying. Go Rams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Key is which team scores a TD first.

If the Bengals score a TD first, I see this going down the wire.

If the Rams get ahead, I see the Bengals playing catchup all game long but just not getting over the hump.

 

Rooting for the Bengals but gut feeling tells me it will be the Rams coming out on top.

 

(hope that gut feeling ends up being indigestion, though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

No fault of Joe Burrow but I am already tired of the media slob fest and as such am pulling for the Rams. Also, a Bengals win just furthers the gap between teams who have won a SB and ones who have not as it relates to the Panthers. Eventually we’re gonna be one of a very few teams left without one. It’s annoying. Go Rams. 

Wow.  I find that take interesting, since all of the media I have taken in has been 80% slanted towards the Rams and Rams player storylines.  Joe Burrow has been a convenient side note.

On another note, I wonder what the "on field energy" will be like before the game.  I will never forget Pat Kirwan when we were in the big game against the Broncos.  Leading up to the game, he had chosen the Panthers.  But when he was on the field and watching the teams warm up, he changed his pick to the Broncos.  He said you could tell how much more prepared and focused the Broncos were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

Wow.  I find that take interesting, since all of the media I have taken in has been 80% slanted towards the Rams and Rams player storylines.  Joe Burrow has been a convenient side note.

On another note, I wonder what the "on field energy" will be like before the game.  I will never forget Pat Kirwan when we were in the big game against the Broncos.  Leading up to the game, he had chosen the Panthers.  But when he was on the field and watching the teams warm up, he changed his pick to the Broncos.  He said you could tell how much more prepared and focused the Broncos were.

Get on Twitter dude. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

No fault of Joe Burrow but I am already tired of the media slob fest and as such am pulling for the Rams. Also, a Bengals win just furthers the gap between teams who have won a SB and ones who have not as it relates to the Panthers. Eventually we’re gonna be one of a very few teams left without one. It’s annoying. Go Rams. 

Well it's either that or have to watch Matt Stafford's wife Karen make a spectacle of herself if he wins a ring. Go Bengals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, onmyown said:

Stafford put up with poo for years I won’t be mad if they win

Stafford also didn't have to sign 2 separate extensions to stay in Detroit.  I don't really have much sympathy for him in that regard.  He chose to play there after his rookie deal.

Cincinnati fans have been stuck with the Bengals since the 70s.

I hear you though.  Neither team winning really bothers me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...