Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Down or Trade Away Player(s)


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Toomers said:

You posted incorrect information that directly contradicted his information, exact contract details, and knowledge. The details are important. And you called everyone out while you didn’t understand the details yourself. 
 

   And on to step 2 of denial. The why are you here is right out of the butthurt Huddle playbook. Last I checked, Cam was on this team at the end of the season. And countless posters said I would be gone after predicting that Rhule’s tenure would be a disaster. I was a Steelers troll for suggesting exercising Darnolds option was a colossal mistake. Should I leave for being correct?

Well your first paragraph is not correct.

Don't really get the second paragraph.  You've made some predictions that may or may not be true.  Did you predict Cam would be on the team at the end of the season?  good for you I guess.  Jury's still out on Rhule's tenure (we just finished year 2 of a 7 year contract by the way) and we'll know how bad extending Darnold's option was at the end of next year.  You might be correct - but saying you are already correct is actually not correct.

Bottom line - I don't care that you are here - just wish you were more respectful toward my fellow panther fans.  You obviously are not a fan but you seem to think you are somehow contributing.  But to me, it just looks like you are here to somehow feel superior to everyone, which I find ironic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

Well your first paragraph is not correct.

Don't really get the second paragraph.  You've made some predictions that may or may not be true.  Did you predict Cam would be on the team at the end of the season?  good for you I guess.  Jury's still out on Rhule's tenure (we just finished year 2 of a 7 year contract by the way) and we'll know how bad extending Darnold's option was at the end of next year.  You might be correct - but saying you are already correct is actually not correct.

Bottom line - I don't care that you are here - just wish you were more respectful toward my fellow panther fans.  You obviously are not a fan but you seem to think you are somehow contributing.  But to me, it just looks like you are here to somehow feel superior to everyone, which I find ironic.

  It’s absolutely correct. The thread was discussing trading CMC. You not only left any of his relevant guaranteed base salary figures out, you posted numbers that were not relevant if traded. A called others silly when you were wrong. As you admitted.

   May or may not? Let’s see….

  Tre Boston contract being stupid

   Acquiring Okung and paying him when he didn’t want to play anymore. 
 
   Signing Teddy with 34M guaranteed at 3/63M

   Weatherly, Seth Roberts, Whitehead, 

   Keeping KK Short at 13M

   2021

  Darnold trade

  Darnold extension. And it’s bad no matter what he does now. You think if he was a FA that they, or any team, would pay him more than 5M(if that) to even be on the team this year? That’s at least 13.8M in lost value already. That’s bad. 
 

   Sign Erving and Elf in the first morning of FA. 
 

   Passing on a QB or Slater for Horn. 
 

   Giving Robbie A. an extension after drafting a WR with 2nd pick for 30M. 
 

   Moving Chinn to S

Thats a lot of hits with the only miss being that I understood giving CMC his deal. I would have traded him then at his highest value, but didn’t blame them for not. We can fact check every one of them. 
 

    And you obviously do care if I’m here because you specifically asked why I was here. In this thread. Anything else? Not my fault that pointing out reality to the echo chamber of hope is so troubling to you. And the respect I’m shown by your fellow fans is laughable. I’ve been called every name in the book. Simply for pointing out factual numbers. Just like you have. It’s why there’s only 10 or so posters on here that a person can have a reasonable discussion with. So save it. Been here awhile and seen all sides of everyone. You included. 

Edited by Toomers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

You know what the worst part of all this is?

We'll be having the same arguments/debates/conversations NEXT OFFSEASON, too. 

Probably. We'll have coach/rich people worshippers defending the status quo calling it consistency and then those who want the team to be better and make better choices and have better coaches/players unhappy with yet another losing season and tired of the ineffectiveness of this poorly run franchise.

People talk about Rhule getting fired next year....but I'm not buying it. Tepper is too stubborn and Rhule is too good a conman.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...