Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Washington Commanders lol


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, PhillyB said:

literally the most uncharismatic, vague, unmarketable, weird ass name they possibly could've picked

Agreed. I could have maybe got used to it if it was something like "The Washington Commando's" but Commanders is just.....bad. I just picture a commander being a person shouting orders and not really doing anything as opposed to the Commando actually taking action and fighting. Neither would be my first pick but even just that simple difference is big.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

I like the new name. Jerseys and logo are tight too

 

12921F44-57B9-4066-AD3E-9A7AD4FB97E4.jpeg

The uniforms are dope the name is trash. No way it stands at this rate. Too much backlash.

Admirals, Sentinels, The Warriors, all would have been 100x better.

Edited by OneBadCat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/2/2022 at 6:20 AM, PandaMan said:

I don’t think Dan Snyder is capable of much critical thinking.  The name Commanders isn’t catchy, and it doesn’t even have a good abbreviation/nickname like you said.  Commies is literally the only thing lol.  Aside from Cummanders 

Yes but at least in Europe WC is an abbreviation for toilette 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know that. I'm not predicting it. Just putting the information out there so I will have receipts for later on when this dude turns into a stud at this level too.  It's kinda bittersweet, he'd help our offense out a great deal, but I'm wanting a QB next draft, so adding another weapon for Bryce is counterproductive in that regard.
    • I'm not sure if NO will be as QB aggressive as some assume.  They may focus on landing a top line prospect and slow rolling the rebuild for next year.  Could see them roll the dice in R3-4 to compete with Rattler, maybe a Howard fit.     I think the QB starved team's just take the gamble the Saints don't want Sanders, and target a mid to late 1st pick for a trade up to land him.  Still don't think Milroe or Shough are going R1.   But I think what may get lost in the trade up talk is about it being QB specific. A top team trying to get over the top could be the juicy trade (or two) that happens in round 1. Something I've flirted with is how aggressive Buffalo could be.  They have the ammunition for a big trade up, and I think Golden would pair super well with Coleman.  They need to cut to the chase and get playmakers there for Allen.  So yeah, love the idea of a BUF/ATL trade where they move up for him.  I'm even thinking about LAR getting aggressive for Warren or Loveland.  Imagine McVay rolling into 2026 with that added piece for a future QB...      
    • Unfortunately, Ice, there are some blueprints of hybrid LB/edge players who were busts too--Everette Brown is one, but he was forced into a 4-3 DE role here.  I would say that the 3-4 defense has a lot of wiggle room for hybrids at the OLB/Edge position--I am just not seeing Walker as an elite player at any one role.  Coverage?  Rushing the passer from the 9?  And at his size... If we take him, I hope that I am wrong because there are some personalities I really would love to be on this roster.  Jihaad Campell is one.  Bech is another. 
×
×
  • Create New...