Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule and Eli Apple


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Michael G said:

If I remember Eli wasn't really doing much here. He had an injury which he felt he couldn't play on, but Rhule and the training staff here thought he could, or something. They thought he was milking the injury (I dunno). Kind of what Antonio Brown claimed about Arians and the Bucs. I cant remember where I read that....

Anyway Apple is playing better now than he was here, and He's going to the Sb while Rhule (and most of the rest of us) will be watching it at home..

I always thought he was milking it too. But when even players like CMC are discouraged by HS coaching techniques…what can you say (yea speculation). And yea Apple is a drama queen borderline head case

Regardless you don’t talk to a player like that whatsoever. These aren’t children they’re men with families. Apple has made some boneheaded plays but he’s also made some impactful plays in the playoffs. 

Point is, someone was able to coach Apple into some worthwhile productivity, meanwhile we have a giant man baby as HC.

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that sports reporters have this thing they can do where they just print some dudes quote about another professional without comment from anyone else (Rhule in this case) just shows how it’s a form of sub journalism. 
 

Who knows if Rhule said it or not but Apple has basically zero credibility after getting cut at multiple orgs. So…Rhule’s thoughts were probably shared by a significant portion of the league. Secondly..What has Eli Apple done to inspire confidence in anything he says? Dude literally dropped off boards in the draft bc of character concerns, got cut from multiple teams bc of the same. 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Not taking Rhule's side but "according to a very close source" means nothing.

Yeah.  All these articles about Rhule have been “anonymous sources.”  Yet most of our players have come out on record in defense of Rhule.  Something doesn’t add up.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

guys we’ve been over this

players aren’t going to come on a record saying things like this and if you can’t understand why no one is going to be able to explain it

personally I find it hard to believe people just come up with this poo out of thin air just because

if that were the case I mean there is a poo ton of other things Joe Shmoe has said about Rhule that could be ‘reported’ and garner much more traffic

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Yeah.  All these articles about Rhule have been “anonymous sources.”  Yet most of our players have come out on record in defense of Rhule.  Something doesn’t add up.

Have they (honest question), or have they said things in general support of the team and their teammates? Seems like it was more the latter than the former. Players weren't openly condeming Meyer in Jax either even when it was clear that he was terrible.

I'm just saying there is an inherent conflict of interest in players commenting on their coaching staff.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Reebis21 said:

The fact that anybody thinks Apple “really showed him” is laughable. In the literal sense, yea sure….he plays. But he sucks and is an ass clown.

I can assure u no Bengals fans would be upset if he was off their team next year.

The bottom line is he’s gonna play in the Super Bowl after Rhule told him he won’t ever play again, and Matt Rhule lead a team to a 5-12 record. Maybe Matt Rhule doesn’t know sh*t.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Smithers said:

Yeah.  All these articles about Rhule have been “anonymous sources.”  Yet most of our players have come out on record in defense of Rhule.  Something doesn’t add up.

Players have to say publicly they support any coach they have. It’s probably written into their contract. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it was less Tepper mandating it and more Tepper finally relenting and allowing it. I've always maintained that I think what caused Reich to be fired midseason was likely him going to Tepper and saying something along the lines of "Either let me play Dalton and five this team a chance to compete or just go ahead and fire me now."
    • I honestly think it was a mutual, collective decision. Canales might have been hired to be the Panthers head  coach because he was the best chance to get Bryce where he needed to be to succeed and did everything...I mean he and Morgan did EVERYTHING possible to create a successful situation for Bryce. And it was obvious... painfully obvious that not only was it not working, the team was losing and it was effecting everything. Canales was hired because they thought he could help Bryce, but he was hired as the PANTHERS head coach, not Bryce's personal coach. If everyone could see this was failing far beyond what anyone could have and it didn't look like it was anything that could be fixed quickly....then that everyone who could see would have to include Canales himself who is responsible for not just Bryce, but the whole damn team has to have looked at what it was doing to the team and their chances to win and said, we have to choose what is best for Bryce or the Panthers. He came in and said he had no personal attachment to any player, and that means he has no personal attachment to Bryce. He's going to do what is best to help the team win. If that means benching Bryce, then that's what he's going to do. Did he make this call without Teppers blessing or input? Hell no. Did they come into the Monday meeting having both come to the same conclusion regarding Bryce? I would have a hard time arguing that wasn't the case. All in leadership has to have seen it wasn't just not working...it was killing the team and they had to make this switch for the betterment of the team soon or else lose the season completely. No way would Canales had bern campaigning for Bryce to stay in there. He's not that dumb. Sometimes regardless of the work you do, you have to realize when it's futile and the earlier you recognize it, the better off you will be.
×
×
  • Create New...