Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wait, it doesn't take 7 years to make a winning team?!?!?!??!?!?!?

Sean Payton's Vicodin

By Sean Payton's Vicodin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

Matt Rhule inherited a team far better than John Fox did, far better than Ron Rivera did, and they made immediate strides.

Meh, I dont agree here. Rhule inherited an empty roster and almost 100 million in dead cap.  Fox and Rivera both had oppportuntiies to go on shopping sprees, and didnt lose 60% of his roster in their first season of coaching. 

Not defending anyone, just calling out the rational differences between both coaches.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
parker Rising Star

parker

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

Matt Rhule inherited a team far better than John Fox did, far better than Ron Rivera did, and they made immediate strides. Rhule is just a bad coach and a worse evaluator of talent. That is all this is.

 

Are you kidding me?  The 2002 roster had Muhammad, Smith, Walls, Steussie, Mitchell, Donnalley, Peppers, Jenkins, Buckner, Rucker, Fields, Morgan, Grant and Minter and Kasay.  Which one of those would you kick out for one of the 2020 starters?  

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jopie87 Veteran

jopie87

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Meh, I dont agree here. Rhule inherited an empty roster and almost 100 million in dead cap.  Fox and Rivera both had oppportuntiies to go on shopping sprees, and didnt lose 60% of his roster in their first season of coaching. 

Not defending anyone, just calling out the rational differences between both coaches.

Fair point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dory Contributor

Dory

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, jopie87 said:

Nothing that happened 30 years ago plays any role in this. This regime turned it around in 3 years. I'm not going to mock Zac Taylor because the Bengals sucked when he was in grade school. He turned them around in 3 years. 

The point is it took decades to find the regime to turn things around

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jopie87 Veteran

jopie87

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, parker said:

Are you kidding me?  The 2002 roster had Muhammad, Smith, Walls, Steussie, Mitchell, Donnalley, Peppers, Jenkins, Buckner, Rucker, Fields, Morgan, Grant and Minter and Kasay.  Which one of those would you kick out for one of the 2020 starters?  

Fair point as well. I was looking mainly at how those teams performed in the last year of the prior coach. That team in 2001 lost like 15 in a row and the year before Rivera came in, the team was awful too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

Yes, absolutely we do. 

Zac Taylor has been there for three seasons.

First season, they were terrible.

Second season, they made progress.

Year three, AFC Championship game.

It doesn't take 7 years to rebuild. It is actually comical for any coach to think that it does. 7 years is a huge period of time when the average NFL career comes in somewhere around 2.5 years. A 7 year rebuild is essentially saying that you need nearly 3 full passes on your roster to get it right.

you cant just choose a winoow for a rebuild, lol. The bengals have been in a 30 year drought. They have players from the last 6 drafts still on that roster. Mike Brown has been the "GM" for the bengals for over a decade... is that when the rebuild started?

 

or do we just choose when the bengals drafted Burrows?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

Fair point as well. I was looking mainly at how those teams performed in the last year of the prior coach. That team in 2001 lost like 15 in a row and the year before Rivera came in, the team was awful too.

you mean before Fox came in? And then the year after we found our franchise QB. SAme with Rivera.

 

The one thing the NFL has constantly shown is that HCs go down with their QBs, and succeed with them as well.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites
parker Rising Star

parker

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

Yes, absolutely we do. 

Zac Taylor has been there for three seasons.

First season, they were terrible.

Second season, they made progress.

Year three, AFC Championship game.

It doesn't take 7 years to rebuild. It is actually comical for any coach to think that it does. 7 years is a huge period of time when the average NFL career comes in somewhere around 2.5 years. A 7 year rebuild is essentially saying that you need nearly 3 full passes on your roster to get it right.

It's going to be different for each team.  Getting Burrow was a game changer for the Bengals.  Do you think Taylor gets to the AFC championship with Sam Darnold as his QB?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
parker Rising Star

parker

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, jopie87 said:

Fair point as well. I was looking mainly at how those teams performed in the last year of the prior coach. That team in 2001 lost like 15 in a row and the year before Rivera came in, the team was awful too.

It's easy to forget how great that roster was.  They lost almost all those games by 3 points or less.  Fox drafter Peppers, Deshaun Foster and Will Witherspoon that year.  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jopie87 Veteran

jopie87

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, parker said:

It's going to be different for each team.  Getting Burrow was a game changer for the Bengals.  Do you think Taylor gets to the AFC championship with Sam Darnold as his QB?

I think the makeup of the team is critical. Taking Burrow may have been a no-brainer. But go back to the draft this year, the no-brainer was to take a tackle. They took a risk to go with a star their QB wanted and it paid off. I don't know that that team makes the playoffs if they draft a tackle instead.

I just want the team to win. It's incredibly frustrating knowing that the process for this team is to maybe, possibly be good somewhere around 2025. Any period of time where I have to be jealous of Bengals fans isn't going to be a good time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SazmoRanger Proficient

SazmoRanger

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Dory said:

The point is it took decades to find the regime to turn things around

Yeah, but I think he’s talking about Tepper AND Rhule talking about it taking 7 years. So no, it shouldn’t take 7 years. It’s taking 7 years because Rhule is way over his head. 
 

Do you think that the Panthers wouldn’t be in a hell of a lot better position if the 49ers, Rams, Titans, Chiefs, etc organizations were making the choices instead of Marty/Rhule? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Gameday Thread: KC-CAR

      By strato · Posted

      He made some excellent throws but he always has made some excellent throws here and there. I don't know what to think, which is what I was apprehensive about. Is he going to have a decent downfield game? Because okay Legette dropped one, but someone was giving stats prior to the bye or during it where he had two downfield completions and one of them was the jump ball that is just launched and fingers are crossed that our guy comes down with it, and yesterday we saw that again. The Russell Wilson school of downfield passing.  I don't feel like that is sustainable, but at the same time you have to do Something to make the defense understand they have to defend that downfield throws. Like i said, confused.  I guess I'm going to review the game for myself and look closely at his mechanics and stuff because if he actually fixed that stuff it explains the better throws. And that has been my biggest objection, or what I see as the thing that makes or breaks his chances, that unorthodox dropback and tippy toe action and not having his feet set which limits velocity etc etc. 
    • Manna
      Crazy stat

      By Manna · Posted

      The negative Nancy in me (or objective?) says that they had a bye week to prepare for the Chiefs. However, it’s one thing to have a good plan and it’s another to actually execute it. For all the flack he’s received (from me as well), Bryce seemingly has put his head down and worked his tail off and his play is giving me hope. The first 18-game Bryce showed no progression whatsoever. He gets benched, comes back, and has shown steady progress every week he has started. I think I’m starting to see what the Bryce lovers and unconditional defenders were saying all along, and I hope he can show that on a regular basis for the sake of our QB1 position. 
    • Bear Hands
      Some Thoughts on Our Remaining Games

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Yeah, we could still very well end up 4-13 with the 2nd pick.   I think LVR has the inside track for 1, with only a JAX team as a team on docket that could be beatable.    
×
×
  • Create New...