At number 6 the Carolina Panthers select...Charles Cross???

[mrcompletely11]

2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

We'd be all in on a QB if you had a great prospect in the 1st round this year. However, almost every pundit feels that none of the guys in this year's draft is worthy of a top 10 draft spot. If we draft a below average talent out of desperation it'll only set us back more.

This team is now a year behind on the rebuild due to our terrible 2021 season. If we can fix the O-line in 2022, any QB we acquire afterwards (draft or FA) should be in a good position to succeed. No one is going to thrive behind out current line.

 

He doesnt get it man, he simply is being intentionally too obtuse to understand this simple point.

[Growl]

Just now, SCO96 said:

We'd be all in on a QB if you had a great prospect in the 1st round this year. However, almost every pundit feels that none of the guys in this year's draft is worthy of a top 10 draft spot. If we draft a below average talent out of desperation it'll only set us back more.

This team is now a year behind on the rebuild due to our terrible 2021 season. If we can fix the O-line in 2022, any QB we acquire afterwards (draft or FA) should be in a good position to succeed. No one is going to thrive behind out current line.

 

There will be good QBs that come out of this class as there always is. Picking #9 or #11 or #6 is going to yield a similar crop of potential at the QB spot next season. Delaying the inevitable only delays potential success. The last sentence is not only a silly fallacy, but also seems to imply that a top 6 pick is the only way to add OL talent. Opportunities for OTs are always there. Opportunities for QBs are not.

[Growl]

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He doesnt get it man, he simply is being intentionally too obtuse to understand this simple point.

“guys if I say these prospects aren’t good then they aren’t good! why won’t you dummies listen to me!”

[mrcompletely11]

2 minutes ago, Growl said:

“guys if I say these prospects aren’t good then they aren’t good! why won’t you dummies listen to me!”

Every single analyst and every single scout all acknowledge this, its only you that cannot seem to process it. 

[ClawOn]

2 hours ago, 45catfan said:

Yes.  If you keep up with the draft process at all, you would know that last year's QB crop had draftnics drooling all over themselves.  Heck, I even wanted one last year. This year not so much.  Just by the law of averages, one of these guys will likely pan out, but determining who based of their college careers is a crap shoot.  There is no Tervor Lawrence-type of guys who had sustained success.  You have one-hit wonders in Pickett/Corral and a guy like Howell that regressed.  Then you have the guy from Liberty who ate bad competition alive, but struggled against the big dogs.

You want someone other than Lawrence from last year's class?  I don't. not sure the teams that drafted them do either 

[MechaZain]

2 hours ago, 45catfan said:

His kick-slide is super choppy.  He has to work on that big time.  I like the 'nasty' in the screen game though, he's like a heat seeking missile looking for someone to hit.

Same. A good playcaller could do a lot with with him and CMC.

[mrcompletely11]

I will ask you again, with your plan what is your solution for fixing the oline?

[Growl]

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Every single analyst and every single scout all acknowledge this, its only you that cannot seem to process it. 

Oh wow do they? Every single scout? 

at least you’ve put a timer on your argument, in a week we won’t have to pretend like your argument has any credence anymore. 

[SCO96]

12 minutes ago, Growl said:

There will be good QBs that come out of this class as there always is. Picking #9 or #11 or #6 is going to yield a similar crop of potential at the QB spot next season. Delaying the inevitable only delays potential success. The last sentence is not only a silly fallacy, but also seems to imply that a top 6 pick is the only way to add OL talent. Opportunities for OTs are always there. Opportunities for QBs are not.

After our 1st pick at #6 in round one, we don't pick again until Day 3. We don't have much opportunity to add any top OL (or any players) after the 1st round. I could see taking a risk on a QB if we had 2nd and 3rd round draft choices. Rhule's "brilliant" trades have left the team with very little draft choices this off season. 

Edited January 10, 2022 by SCO96

[Fright]

Nah we’re drafting a QB and letting him “learn” behind Sam, that way when we’re 2-6 mid season, Rhule can bench Sam and blame him and when we end up 4-13 he can end the season blaming the rook. 
 

Two for one excuses!!! Just what Rhule loves! 

[WOW!!]

58 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

You want someone other than Lawrence from last year's class?  I don't. not sure the teams that drafted them do either 

I'd take Wilson, Lance or Fields in a heartbeat.  

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

I'd take Wilson, Lance or Fields in a heartbeat.  

Mac and Mills are proven to be competent starters

[WOW!!]

Mr.C stop wasting your time.. You can't argue with ppl unwilling to do the research.. 

Your plan is the best situation for us..

[WOW!!]

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Mac and Mills are proven to be competent starters

I'll stick with my opinion on them for another season.. 2nd or 3rd round option..