Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule Got to Hand Pick 2 QB's...Will There Be a 3rd**


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, BrianS said:

You're wrong.  When you look at the different combinations, the common denominator for success is the QB.

If you have a bad QB, it doesn't matter at all how good your line is.  Hello New Orleans Saints.

If you have a good QB and a bad line, it comes down to coaching and scheme.  Hello Cincinnati Bengals.

For clarity, I'm not implying either of those scenarios fit the Panthers.  I'm also not implying that a good OLine is irrelevant.  But when you talk about truly changing the trajectory of a team, only a good QB can do that with any regularity.

This is why it just baffles the mind why we seem to be completely opposed to the idea of taking a swing at one.  Yes, 100%, we're going to miss.  QB's even in the first round are 50/50 chances.  But you aren't winning the lottery unless you buy a ticket, and we seem completely unwilling to do so.

So Pickett, Howell, etc. have the same grades as Burrow, Lance, Mac, or Lawrence...this is not the year to ''swing'' this is the year to PREPARE to swing, so that when you do swing, you have a team / roster ready to usher in a rookie to IMPROVE his chances to succeed early. 

People have gone broke ''buying tickets''. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...