Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rank the 2022 QB Draft Class


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

...not just to be a contrarian:

1. Matt Corral

2. Kenny Pickett

3A. Carson Strong

3B. Sam Howell

4A. Malik Willis

4B. Desmond Ridder

NFL Scouts like Strong a lot more than the website rankings show.  He is the best pure QB in the draft but Pickett's year puts him just an edge ahead (along with being a tad more mobile and no knee concern).  I just love his decision making, deep ball, and downfield accuracy.  Hard to teach those. 

Unsure about Willis and Ridder but love Ridder's upside. 

Edited by davos
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Seriously?

Dude drops dimes fading away off his back foot 50 yards down field. 
 

Willis is this years Lance in my opinion. Has all the tools but like Rum said, he definitely needs to sit a year and be developed 

Lance is a good comp. I've seen comparisons to Josh Allen in terms of arm strength and Jalen Hurts in terms of mobility. His decision making is his biggest issue right now. He's definitely raw but I think has the most potential out of this whole class. His uncle is also former Panther James Anderson, so at least their are some bloodlines for NFL talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Good Thread.   Finally someone starts a thread that is more than bitching.

1.  Kenny Pickett.  Although he threw a lot of interceptions before this season, he is still a gunslinger with no mobility; his short and long accuracy, however, was solid this year.  He has good height and a lot of experience, which I think will help him transition more quickly.  Finally, he wins games, evidenced by Pitt's success this year.

2.  Matt Corral.  Although he scares me on the next level, his athleticism is what the new NFL seems to want in a QB.  Most of his passes (52%) were within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage and his accuracy beyond that was suspect.

3.  Sam Howell.  He has the athleticism to run and has accuracy.  Average arm strength.  Was very accurate in the short passing game, had some issues this year (with lesser WRs) in the longer passes.  I think he will be better than advertised, but not a star.  However, PFF compares his profile to Lamarr Jackson, something that surprised me, due to his run/pass threat that emerged this season.

4.  Malik Willis.  Much of what I see is based on his confidence in his physical ability to make a play, even when a play is not to be made.  In the NFL, you can't throw a pass into a tight window with regular success and holding onto the ball too long will end your career.  As a running QB, he will be one of the best; as a passing QB, he will need much more discipline and coaching in his mechanics.

5.  Carson Strong.  The injury concern is strong in my assessment of him, but I put that aside to look at his long ball accuracy.  We have some long ball threats (Anderson, Smith, Moore) so he could be a good match.  He has excellent to good success on short and longer throws.  I think he needs a year or two to develop, and may never be more than a serviceable backup.

6. Desmond Ridder.  Ridder had a big, stud OL and was rarely challenged with extensive pressure.  His short accuracy was solid, but when he had to get yards downfield, he was below average.  That was a red flag for me--a QB with time should be able to succeed on every level.

Great post.   Thanks for the write-up for all of us guys who aren't watching too much college ball.  

From my non-studied perspective, Pickett seems like one of the best bets.  Experienced.  Very Successful.  The kid knows how to get W's.  He's also reported to have that charisma you need in a #1 QB.   

Willis is a guy that is super athletic and has a gun for an arm.  I've watched a few of his Youtube highlights and they were impressive.   Not sure how good a pure pocket passer he would be.   But he seems like Cam Newton lite so maybe that's not too big of an issue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Newbie said:

They’re calling him the best center prospect in forever. It would help us tremendously to have 1 stud somewhere on the line like Nelson did for the Colts. I think it’s adorable that people on here think we can find a trade partner to move back in the 1st and he’ll still fall in our laps. 

Rhule doesn’t like O linemen who are dominant at one position he likes em to be inadequate  at 2-3 positions. Smdh 

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThPantherFan said:

Don't agree.  We go for a tackle in round one and then pick a quarterback on the next round we have.

 

Yeah I am not sure what the hell he is thinking.  Trading back is going to get us the 3rd or 4rth best qb and a 2nd tier tackle.   Who is going to give us a kings ransom for pick 6?   Someone give me a scenario of an offer that is going to blow us away?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For perspective, and not that I always agree with him but Kiper said his top rated QB (Pickett) in this draft would have been the sixth rated guy against last years class behind Lawrence, Wilson, Jones, Lance and Fields.  Totally agree there.  I think Sam Howell will drop some due to his average measurables and stats this year but still believe he can play.  LOL at the Lamar Jackson comp. Baker Mayfield is a better one.  Of course he hasn’t been great so that’s concerning 

 

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...