Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rasul Douglas


33inNC
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Wes21 said:

Our staff literally said that offensive lineman are the hardest position group to grab outside of the draft.  And yet they still relied on finding them outside of the draft.

THIS. Staff says they cannot find OL in free agency, yet waste draft capital on db's. Draft some quality OLmen you dumbasses!  Also, stop trading for DB's when you have some who are good. Another CB won't make you a championship team!!

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

didnt we do one of these threads for Bashaud Breeland too?

Yes, but he had an injury that kind of made sense to move on. Douglas looked like our best CB last year, then was unceremoniously let walk. Then, we draft a CB #8 and trade for 2 of them. W. T. F. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yes, because other teams drafted quality linemen, if they aren't quality they release them. It's like the rarest position to fix in free agency. That all defensive draft was cool though

Not even just the draft, people were thinking guys like Andrew Whitfield were almost washed up when he was up for FA and he’s been all-pro caliber with the Rams.  We just settle for scrubs and don’t make moves for quality linemen 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Whitworth and let’s be honest, it does take two to tango and like Stafford, he may have preferred LA. It’s easy to say we should have drafted X if they we available but FAs choose their destination even if we were interested. 

Ha, yeah not even sure how I got Whitfield out of Whitworth.  But yeah, you’re right.  It’s hard to gauge player’s preferences when some guys don’t want to come here, but good free agents who could’ve gotten a lot more like Reddick signed with us for cheap. Never know what’s going on behind the scenes so it’s easy to be cynical 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Douglas is not a cover corner. He is more of a zone corner. He has shown good eyes and instincts and has good size. I think after last year Snow wanted to play more man, especially after our 3rd down woes. That's why they let him walk. He has looked really good this year because he is being used the right way by his coaching staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...