Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Perryman to the pro bowl


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

He’s been with them what he was expected to be with us.  Good run stopper, suspect in coverage.  He didn’t practice with us basically ever due to injury and was one of the only unvaxxed guys on the team.  He would be better than Carter for sure, but at the time it was honestly the right move.  He likely would’ve been cut anyways 

Edited by PandaMan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only part that hurts is that we are paying 2 million for him to play there.

The pro-bowl is just a popularity contest and is completely unwatchable event. 

Our issues are way bigger than a LBer who has issues staying healthy. If you want to get mad, go and look over the money and draft capital spent at QB. It makes the Perryman situation look like a warmup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Waldo said:

The only part that hurts is that we are paying 2 million for him to play there.

The pro-bowl is just a popularity contest and is completely unwatchable event. 

Our issues are way bigger than a LBer who has issues staying healthy. If you want to get mad, go and look over the money and draft capital spent at QB. It makes the Perryman situation look like a warmup. 

Just like the Butker thing though and Christenson not starting. Its just pure incompetence in evaluating.... he is still much better than Carter and we had him on a super cheap two year contract. We lose Carter next year and will have to pay someone more who will likely not be as good now.

Edited by Jared Patterson
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

We signed him bc we saw talent in him

and wanted him here.

 

we traded him bc he didn’t want to be here and didn’t practice along with internal vaccine shenanigans. 
 

it was the right move at the time. It was a free draft pick for us. 

How is paying 2M a “free” draft pick? Gotta hear this. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...