Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cardinals vs Rams last night vs Panthers


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

The game last night between the Cardinals and Rams was a tremendously enjoyable game 

Two quality  NFL teams and two young HC coaches who also called offensive plays 

there hasn’t been a Panthers  game in years that looked like that 

I asked myself if a Rhule team could ever look like that and the answer is ‘no’  

yes, I know both of those coaches made mistakes in their early tenure, but they got better, not worse 

if Tepper does not show  Matt Rhule the door come Jan 10, then that tells me the problem is the owner  

The owner won’t change.  

it’s his club and he can do what he wantS

it may well be ‘lipstick on a pig’ with Rhule but it’s Tepper’s pig. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cards weren’t afraid to can their first round QB after a year or so and it’s been tremendous for their team. Kliff has gotten away from the cutesy calls and running more NFL schemes to the success of Kyler.

 

One thing to remember is that Kliff and Rhule met a couple times in the Big 12 and that’s why I think we’re 2-0 vs. the Cards with Rhule. He’s just a better college coach and deserves to do well in the NCAA where he can recruit and do things that appeal to 18 year olds rather than grown men with families. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Panthera onca said:

Both of those coaches went out and got the QB that they wanted. Murray looks like the real deal, and McVay decided Goff was garbage and shipped him off to the football wasteland known as Detroit, and managed to get Stafford in the process. A great QB is everything.

Most of this fan base would have a fit if they spent a #1 pick on a QB a year after spending a top 10 pick on a QB.  They would start whining some gibberish about needing to protect him or give him weapons.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm curious why Pittsburgh let the Conner go? He looked like a legit player and can catch out of the back field. Between him, Kirk and Hopkins at WR, what more does Arizona need? 

Granted, the end of the game was horrible- everything about Arizona's clock management when they recovered the on-side kick was brutally inept.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

It’s a QB driven league 

draft your guy, pair him with a QB guru, have a former head coach run your defense

amazing how arguably the most unsuccessful franchise in sports figured that out but we couldnt

Also, Arizona didn't waste precious time with a incompetent head coach, they fired him after one year.

Tepper needs to take note.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

I'm curious why Pittsburgh let the Conner go? He looked like a legit player and can catch out of the back field. Between him, Kirk and Hopkins at WR, what more does Arizona need? 

Granted, the end of the game was horrible- everything about Arizona's clock management when they recovered the on-side kick was brutally inept.

I was surprised as well. Connor is legit. He stepped up well for Pittsburgh when Bell was the starter and went down. Now he is flourishing with Arizona. To think he was a FA back that we could have picked up!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Most of this fan base would have a fit if they spent a #1 pick on a QB a year after spending a top 10 pick on a QB.  They would start whining some gibberish about needing to protect him or give him weapons.

 

Hell some people are wanting to roll with Darnold next year because our line is terrible. You have to have a QB to compete. If there is one we like we need to try to obtain him. Best case scenario is new coach and new QB next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, raleigh-panther said:

The game last night between the Cardinals and Rams was a tremendously enjoyable game 

Two quality  NFL teams and two young HC coaches who also called offensive plays 

there hasn’t been a Panthers  game in years that looked like that 

I asked myself if a Rhule team could ever look like that and the answer is ‘no’  

yes, I know both of those coaches made mistakes in their early tenure, but they got better, not worse 

if Tepper does not show  Matt Rhule the door come Jan 10, then that tells me the problem is the owner  

The owner won’t change.  

it’s his club and he can do what he wantS

it may well be ‘lipstick on a pig’ with Rhule but it’s Tepper’s pig. 

 

Yeah I was thinking the same thing as I was watching the Bills and Bucs play on Sunday.  We aren't even close to being in the same league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Raiders have already shown enough interest in Jeanty that anyone after 6 that wants him and would trade up for him, will already be calling the Jags for a trade anyways. The only thing them signaling interest in Jeanty could do if their interest was to trade back, would be to bluff the Raiders into making a swap with them to add draft assets while still drafting whoever they are actually targeting.
    • I love when people go after his YAC ability as if he wasn't 5th in the Big 12 this past season in YAC, because he was. And you can say his style of YAC doesn't mesh with this type of game, but that on its face is just nonsense, because if he's good enough to be 5th in a major conference, it clearly meshes well with his game. The reason you say it doesn't, is because you think all he is good at is making contested catches because of his radius, but because you haven't watched enough of his full tape, you don't realize that he's consistently used in the screen and short slant game to get the ball in his hands because he actually is a solid YAC guy because he's surprisingly agile for a player of his size.   No, he's no Tyreek, but he has more than enough wiggle to his game that you combine it with everything he does at an elite level because of his size, and it makes for a guy who is going to be a consistent 1k yard and 10+ TD player.  He can be the true outside #1 that we need, but he's also versatile enough to be moved into the slot at times to scheme the ball into his hands against smaller nickel corners or slower linebackers. He's a slightly less physical Mike Evans but with more agility, my comp was always AJ Green.  He's going to be an elite #1 WR in this league for the next decade, if he's there and we pass on him to trade down for another WR, we will regret it for a long time.
    • Here is my theory--The Giants are not 100% happy with their pass rush--15 sacks combined between Thib (6) and Burns (9).  In 2026, The Giants will have to make a choice about Thib.  They would then have 2 Edge rushers on second contracts--probably costing around $65m for both.  Many teams want edge players; draft Carter and trade Thib.  Carter's second contract would be due when Burns' contract expires.  In essence, the Giants would have better Edge rushers at a cost of about $40m.  You could probably get a high draft pick for Thib and save $25m. All that to say, "I don't think they are set at edge yet."
×
×
  • Create New...