Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ufc 106

Tweeder

By Tweeder,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Tweeder Newbie

Tweeder

Posted
Posted

This PPV might have been one of the better PPV I have seen UFC put on. I really thought with the whole Brock thing and then fighters dropping out this might not be worth getting.....I am glad I did though, if you missed it you missed one hell of a show

Most impressive was Little Nog, dude is going to be a beast in the light heavyweight division

Fight most pissed off at Koscheck/Johnson.....this had the potential of being one of the greatest fights ever, and cheating prevented that

Hell of a match between Griffin and Ortiz.....Ortiz wore out in the 3rd, should be a great 3rd fight in the future. I just hated how Ortiz tried to make so many excuses, when he should have just admitted he got beat because he was gassed

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wanderlai Veteran

Wanderlai

Posted
Posted

With all the fighters the UFC has this ppv was weak IMO.

Good to see Lil Nog have a great showing but he has been very good for a long time.

The fight between Kos and Rumble didnt live up to what I thought it would be. Granted eye pokes and fake knees to the head will change things. I do think that Kos is a bigger threat to GSP than Rumble is.

Ortiz and Forrest. Yuck! I watched the ppv on Justin tv and I swear the fight looked like it had lag in it since both fighters were so slow. I dont like either fighter and I think Anderson Silva would beat both in a 2 on 1 fight. Then both fighters turn on the crowd at the end because Tito had a cracked skull...come on, no way he gets medical clearance with a cracked skull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...