Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The notion of building the defense first is a flawed concept rooted in nostalgia.


FuFuLamePoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was listening to some podcast a few days ago and they were talking about how the Bengals have put all their draft resources into the offense and have just decided they'll figure out the defense later. It made me realize we've done the opposite and us and the Bengals are in totally different positions right now. Obviously they got a #1 overall pick in a draft with a strong QB1 (Burrow) but still. They've also accompanied Burrow with Tee Higgins, Jackson Carman, Jamaar Chase, etc. The Bengals are currently must see TV every week whereas I want to pour bleach into my eyes when watching our team right now.

Please. Whenever we move past Rhule who I've already dubbed a failure, I truly see no path he has out of this, rebuild the team the right way next time. Having hard ons for 80's style of football just isn't worth it. Build your offense like Cincinnati did and you'll find yourself in considerably better shape.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think our draft choices were the big problem. In fact I think going all in one side of the ball in a draft can pay off because you end up developing a unit of the team that becomes dominant and masks a lot of the flaws elsewhere. I don't think our selections are necessarily the problem at this point.

Guys that looked good last year look bad now. The defense was on fire at the start of the season and they now they are getting pushed around. Just seems like a coaching and motivation issue.

That said we have clearly ignored the offensive line so I'm not justifying that, but we've been ignoring o-line since 2015 honestly.

Edited by OneBadCat
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first thing for a team to build is a good OL.  That's because the OL protects the team's most valuable  asset, the QB.  

After that, it's probably a good idea to go with the best talent the draft offers you.  Take a top rated defensive player over the 6th WR.   Position need factors in a little bit as well but it shouldn't grossly supersede the highest rated players on your board.  

Over time taking what the draft gives you will result in the best overall and most competitive team.   But this strategy requires patience by the ownership and fan base, which most NFL teams don't have.  

Edited by BlitzMonster
  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A defense is the number one common denominator in modern SB winners. The difference between football then and now is being able to build a creative, adaptive, and exploitive offense due to rules changes and athletes now days.

That basically means don’t run it all the time and find a QB above a game manager, however being a game manager is also very important, especially deep playoffs. That doesn’t mean focus mainly on offense. It’s a philosophy and who you draft change. There always needs to be balance.

Remember, great QB play is only the 3rd common factor in SB winners. The defense, it’s the number 1 commonality. Number 2? Oline.

How you build your team doesn’t matter so long as it gets built. The problem isn’t Rhule wanted to build a defense first. The problem is he did it while ignoring the offense, specifically the oline. There was no balance. There is a big difference.

The Bengals defense are quite good, despite how they built their team. So you’d need to consider the base from which they started building. That includes coaching.

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You start with the lines, picking the best available lineman (offensive or defensive) as your picks come across. Then you work your way out from the lines -- QB, MLB, RB, OLB, WR, DB, S, TE, K, P.

That's kind of a multi-year deal, but unless a unicorn falls to you, you get solid value for building the o and d lines. No matter what the situation, those two pay off in spades. And you can't win crap without either.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A team needs to be balanced, which is the easy way of saying they need to be good on both sides. 2015 was built on a good D and a good O. If a team can only thrive on one side then it looks like being a playoff stepping stone for other teams is your ceiling that year.

I still believe in building around the lines, have an understanding of positional value vs the cap and finding a way to get the most out of the players you have for good or bad. I don't think this crew is very good with any of those things tho. 

 

 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Yeah that's why the Patriots could win only throwing 3 passes 

If the other team doesn't score you can't lose.

this is a losing philosophy because the nfl has evolved to make this far harder to do than scoring bazillions of points. only dinosaurs and flukes disagree 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not wrong to build the defense first, but the problem is we can't stop the run.  Both Fox and Rivera built defenses that were more conservative, but able to stop the run.  You have to be able to stop the run to win a lot of close games.

Our defense now is built to get after the QB.  If we had an offense that could put up points, and teams were having to throw all game, it would probably work a lot better.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's nothing wrong with having an amazing Defense with an average offense(See the Patriots) In fact, I'd argue that an amazing Defense with an average offense has a much better chance of winning the Super Bowl(Sure the Bengals may be fun, but the Patriots would completely shut them down)

The issue is what somebody else on this thread mentioned, the coaching isn't working. We clearly have talent on BOTH sides of the ball, yet we're getting blown out by the most average of teams. Is it Darnolds fault? Is it Cams? Was it Joe Bradys? I have no idea, but when you blame 3 different guys(Darnold first, then Brady, then kinda Cam) you eventually have to go straight to the top with Rhule.

 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

There are three teams I would never want to model my team/process after.  The Lions, the Browns, and the Bengals.  All three have spent the last 20 years showing how its not done.  

I'd say the Lions, Browns Washington and Jets.  All four are just chaotic organizations from the owner on down.  

Not surprisingly, these teams are also among the worst at W/L since 2000.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of this is new information that is recycled old information added to some inferences based on tweets and a reaction to tweets that involve the #2, #3, and #9 picks.  Since there are not many new topics on this board, I thought I would start a thread that considers all reasonable possibilities.  I think this is a pre-draft soap opera that is worthy of popcorn. 1.  First, it began before the college season had ended, when Prime announced that Shedeur Sanders ($$ from now on) should not be drafted by some organizations, basically throwing an Eli/Archie Manning threat out to the world.  Then after free agency, he changed his tune, probably when he realized Cam Ward was going #1 and the Browns and Giants liked the two best players in the draft--Carter and Hunter.  The Raiders signed Geno, the Jets signed Fields, the Saints re-signed Carr to silly money, and suddenly, the only team without a QB was Pittsburgh--and we all know that is where Rodgers is going to end up unless he decides to spelunk his way into retirement. The Rams are another team that might want Sanders, but they do not pick until the end of the draft.  So it seems that the Saints is the only real opportunity to start if you ignore Cleveland (just signed Flacco) and the Giants (who have Russell and Winston now).  It is almost like a game of musical chairs, and it seems telling the Browns to FO may have been a mistake.  2. $$ has a mediocre pro day.  Some were not impacted; some were underwhelmed. Meanwhile, analysts are moving $$ down their boards, out of the top five, then some moved $$ out of the top 10.  It started to look as though Pittsburgh would take him at #21, and possibly the Rams at #26.  3.  Then a miracle happened, sorta.  Derek Carr announced that he is considering shoulder surgery that would/could impact the 2025 season rather profoundly.  Louis Riddick, a close friend of the Sanders family, tweeted the news that the #9 pick just got interesting.  Prime responded with an eyeballs emoji.  4.  Meanwhile, Prime seems to be in "shut up" mode about it, fearing that his involvement is probably not helping--and it was not.   That same close friend, Louis Riddick, said the following on ESPN two days prior to the Carr news breaking.  It is safe to assume that he is speaking on behalf of Prime.   Note that the screen indicates that Kiper was already projecting $$ to the Saints:  5.  It is also noteworthy that the Raiders also brought in $$ for a visit, along with Graham and a few others. However, I think Jeanty is already in silver and black---just due diligence.  Meanwhile, Pittsburgh is sitting there waiting for flower-child Rodgers to emerge from his cave of tranquility to let them know what his spirit animal has told him about playing football in 2025. 6.  And then there is the minor (probably) issue of Milroe being invited to the Green Room.  NFL Network reports that they have actually decreased the number of invites because players sitting in the Green Room is a negative distraction to what they promote as a celebratory event.  So the fact that he got an invitation suggests that there is some first round interest in him because they ask GMs who they should invite (confidentially, of course).  7.  Prime seems to be using this opportunity to keep his Colorado Buffalo program in the spotlight--and it is smart, especially with today's transfer portal.  Has this hurt $$? 8.  After showing no interest in Sanders at the combine (did not meet with him), the Steelers suddenly bring him in for a visit.  The city of Pittsburgh becomes electric.  (This, of course, before the Carr news broke).  Tired of waiting on Moondust Rodgers and frustrated with the Watt situation, Pittsburgh is not forgetting about the Jaxxon Dart rumors and focusing on Sanders.  In fact, one local writer in the Steel City predicted a blockbuster trade, now that Omar Kahn is the new GM:  9.  While some podcast crack and crystal meth users in New Orleans are suggesting that the Saints' solution to this issue is to sign Rodgers (referencing their WRs and suggesting that they draft an OL) on a one-year deal, giving Carr a chance to recover and waiting for the 2026 NFL draft.  Good plan, except your cap situation is rivaled only by the National Debt.  10.  And let's not forget the Rams.  I am sure they would like to bring in their QB of the future for a year to play behind Stafford--and for him at times--so they too are in play.  However, I wonder if they are the team that wants to see if they can develop Milroe.  It just sounds Ramsy. COMMENTARY: I do not think the Steelers are going to trade the top edge rusher in football and a first and second so they can move from 21 to 5 to overdraft an above average QB.  I think they are more likely, however, to trade with the Panthers, sitting right before New Orleans.  New Orleans, on the other hand, could trade up if they think the Steelers or Rams might try to trade with Carolina. If Sanders gets past the Jets, I imagine the phones will be active.  On the other hand, $$ is a lot of hype.  Maybe they know what we do not--that his value is at the end of the round. On the other hand, the Panthers are in a very good spot if Sanders falls to #8.    
    • different viewpoint  Has that helped the Bengals?   …the eagles have premium receivers but they also mostly run the ball and rely heavily on those lines and rotation  football is, and will always be, build from the inside out  
×
×
  • Create New...