Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you need a good laugh....


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

LOL if he is really hired by some incredibly dumb team to be their Head Coach, I envision a Chud/Browns type situation where he is poo-canned 3 or 4 weeks into the season.

The only HC situation is in college period.

I'd be shocked to see him as an OC in the NFL next year but it's possible. How this team does could impact some of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I certainly will be.  He should go back to coaching in college.  Hes not cut out for this level at all.

Several players had career years last year. I didn't like Brady's play calling at all in recent weeks, but that was after Rhule started speaking out about what he wanted out of the offense. I just don't think Rhule and Brady were ever on the same page. Rhule is basically a young John Fox despite what he says. He wants to win with smothering defense and ball control offense. Good luck winning championships with that in the modern NFL... or high level college football for that matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Don't be shocked if Brady resurfaces elsewhere with significantly different results.

I doubt he will be a NFL OC again any time soon. Now college he probably will be a passing game coordinator for a high profile team for sure 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...