Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh McDaniels should’ve been interviewed!

BurnNChinn

By BurnNChinn,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rah53 Contributor

rah53

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

Were you that impressed by his ability to call 99% run plays tonight?

Absolutely. The last time we ran the ball more than 30 times was against Atlanta, and we won. Joe Brady couldn't get away from passing the ball. All he had to do was run it. And against Atlanta, nobody complained about the O-line play. People actually praised how well they played. Every O-linemen has more fun running the ball. That's why Brady was shown the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, rah53 said:

Absolutely. The last time we ran the ball more than 30 times was against Atlanta, and we won. Joe Brady couldn't get away from passing the ball. All he had to do was run it. And against Atlanta, nobody complained about the O-line play. People actually praised how well they played. Every O-linemen has more fun running the ball. That's why Brady was shown the door.

It's so easy! All we gotta do is call running plays and we win all the games!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BurnNChinn Grand Master

BurnNChinn

Posted
  • Author
Posted
22 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Just because he is a very good OC doesn't automatically make him a good HC.

It's almost like some of you can't remember why he is a terrible HC and HC candidate. There is actually proof why that would have been a horrible idea.

 

Way better than what we have now. JS

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MasterAwesome Veteran

MasterAwesome

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, BurnNChinn said:

They ran it and Buffalo knew it. Hell yes he knows how to game plan around stuff, when was last time we’ve had that?

 

12 hours ago, Moo Daeng said:

 

I'm impressed by coaches who make the calls that lead to wins. 

It's not about being cute. It's about winning. 

Yeah he developed a gameplan that was good enough to win.  He did his job.  Doesn't mean I'm in awe of his Madden-style spamming of run plays over and over in 50 mph winds when he has a dominant defense, special teams, and o-line to rely on.  That's basically Rivera's dream gameplan there; the only difference is Rivera didn't have the personnel to pull it off.

I think McDaniels is a good offensive coordinator, I just don't think last night's game elevates him to godlike status which I'm apparently in the minority about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrianS Veteran

BrianS

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Absolutely. I wish that was our offense.

Wrong.

That was terrible offensive football.  It was admitting that Jones didn't have the arm to throw in that wind.  That's all it was.  The game was tight.  There is no excuse.  It's not like the Pats put the game out of reach running.  They were a couple dropped passes away from losing the game.

That's an offense Ron Rivera would be proud of.  BS.  It was a terrible display by a team that effectively admitted the limitations of their rookie QB.  This was a game the Patriots simply didn't lose.  Which is very different than saying they won it.

Barely 200 yards of total offense?  Come on.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CPF4LIFE
      Panthers Prospect Visits/Meetings

      By CPF4LIFE · Posted

      Man folks right on this site said Deion was gonna follow his son to the nfl and have a big impact on his draft stock with his interference and yet we have seen no such thing. He just signed an extension to stay in Colorado for the foreseeable future. The only thing we have seen is so called experts try to tank shedeurs stock with false accusations and rumors and deion just had to step in and shut it down. This why you have to stop listening to what certain people say. Too much hate and emotion in most opinions. 
    • Lurk21
      Reason for Liking or Disliking Prospect X at 8 Overall

      By Lurk21 · Posted

      That's sound logic! I think we could make a case for a few players. I know its not popular  with a few but Warren gives to the  identity we want. Tremble is mostly a blocker. Sanders flashed late but mostly a receiving  threat at the moment. Warren is an automatic 1st down, run blocks, runs the ball and can even line up and throw it. To me he is if you took the Taysom Hill and actually could play tight end too. I just think looking at Goedert, Kelce,  Laporta, Hoeckenson, Baltimore Tight ends, Knox and Kindcaid and etc... all the  last few teams had stellar Tight end play. Warren allows you to be unpredictable  on offense bc he is equally good at being a target, as he is a blocker. Don't want to run Bryce on a qb sneak, plug Warren in with the threat to pass. I would be happy with him, Walker or a few others. As long as the player isn't riding the bench year 1. 
    • Icege
      Verge, why do you like Mykel Williams?

      By Icege · Posted

      Pretty good plan imo considering the following RBs on the schedule: Bijan Robinson (x2) Alvin Kamara (x2) Bucky Irving (x2) Christian McCaffrey Josh Jacobs Kyren Williams James Connor Breece Hall Plus there's back ups like Jets'  Braelon Allen, heavy rushing attacks like the Bills, and teams with an entire stable of backs like the Seahawks to account for. 
×
×
  • Create New...