Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB available for next year


BlitzMonster
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't like Willis but the college list jives otherwise 1-Corral 2-Strong 3-Howell 4-Ridder 5-Willis...but wouldn't necessarily consider all 1st round.  Corral, Strong, yes.  Maybe Howell and Ridder.

The vet/FA list is scary bad/if not even less appealing than the often panned draft class.  There's next to nothing there.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cookinbrak said:

Rather than kill the QB o' the Week, why not work on getting an oline first?

Well I'm sure we'd still be able to get an OL or two if we acquire the like of a Nick Foles.  I can't see a single one of the FA QBs getting north of 7 mil/year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saX man said:

I don't like Willis but the college list jives otherwise 1-Corral 2-Strong 3-Howell 4-Ridder 5-Willis...but wouldn't necessarily consider all 1st round.  Corral, Strong, yes.  Maybe Howell and Ridder.

The vet/FA list is scary bad/if not even less appealing than the often panned draft class.  There's next to nothing there.

 

 

What about Kenny Pickett?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What about Kenny Pickett?

Meh, I'm not saying I'm some guru but I personally don't see it.  He's got the tools and good in the moment skills when forced into pressure but I don't see much more than a Case Keenum type.  Could be wrong but for not having the accuracy of Strong or Howell (who both have great arms), the quickness of a Ridder or Corral, he needs to be perfect and is coming from a quick throw, 1st read offense so there will be a lot of adjustment.  

If we're talking pure QB skills, Strong would be a top 1st rounder most drafts (knee injury is the concern), if we're talking overall potential, then gotta look at Corral.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, saX man said:

Meh, I'm not saying I'm some guru but I personally don't see it.  He's got the tools and good in the moment skills when forced into pressure but I don't see much more than a Case Keenum type.  Could be wrong but for not having the accuracy of Strong or Howell (who both have great arms), the quickness of a Ridder or Corral, he needs to be perfect and is coming from a quick throw, 1st read offense so there will be a lot of adjustment.  

If we're talking pure QB skills, Strong would be a top 1st rounder most drafts (knee injury is the concern), if we're talking overall potential, then gotta look at Corral.

Comedy Paul GIF by CBC

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...