Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Heinike

Paa Langfart

By Paa Langfart,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

4Corners Grand Master

4Corners

Posted
Posted

Heineke is an adequate back up in the NFL. Nothing more, nothing less. It appears to me that the coaching staff for the panthers overlooked this game and just assumed the fairy dust of Cam coming back was gonna be enough to win. Poorly coached game on both sides of the ball and piss poor execution aside from a handful of panthers players. More evidence that Ruhle is in over his head and is not a NFL coach. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paa Langfart Grand Master

Paa Langfart

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

fairy dust of Cam coming back

lol.  yep, that pretty much sums it up.  Lot of fools gold and fools to go along buying it up.  Just look at this forum.

 

Oh well, poor ole fat ass Tep got some good ticket and concession and jersey sales today out of the deal.

Edited by Paa Langfart
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Heineke is an adequate back up in the NFL. Nothing more, nothing less. It appears to me that the coaching staff for the panthers overlooked this game and just assumed the fairy dust of Cam coming back was gonna be enough to win. Poorly coached game on both sides of the ball and piss poor execution aside from a handful of panthers players. More evidence that Ruhle is in over his head and is not a NFL coach. 

Can't blame coaches for players not doing their jobs..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Bingo. It's the coaches' job to get the players to do their job. If they can't, then they're not good coaches.

I’ll preface this by saying I’m a big fan of European football (soccer)… if these excuses were used over there they’d run the manager out in less than a week.

I find it comedic how long of a leash a lot of NFL coaches get. NHL and NBA coaches have already been fired or relieved of their duty 15 games into the seasons this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bingo. It's the coaches' job to get the players to do their job. If they can't, then they're not good coaches.

That seem like a black and white statement with no room for players ever to take blame...

So Sam should never get blame for being bad.. Its the coaches fault he can't do his job..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Can a coach get Djax not to get burnt by Mcclarin 2x or Get Burns to play the read option like he has most of the year??

Probably not… but the coach can probably one of the plethora of corners we’ve traded for, drafted, or signed and see if they fare any better.

Orrrrr… on obvious running downs role with Fox and YGM, or occasionally move Burns to a standing OLB position…

Just some thoughts…

If Rhule doesn’t want to make any changes he can join me up in the nosebleeds, we can enjoy some beers together and both be fans while someone else coaches the team.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, WOW!! said:

That seem like a black and white statement with no room for players ever to take blame...

So Sam should never get blame for being bad.. Its the coaches fault he can't do his job..

Rhule wanted full control. This is what happens with full control - full accountability. Sam is here because Rhule wanted him here. Same as the other 52 guys. We'd be better off and Rhule would have more of a chance to succeed with a strong GM with final roster say. IF Rhule comes back next year, it needs to be without final roster say. He did nothing to earn that and he's shown he shouldn't have been given it. Want to come back? That's gotta go.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Rhule wanted full control. This is what happens with full control - full accountability. Sam is here because Rhule wanted him here. Same as the other 52 guys. We'd be better off and Rhule would have more of a chance to succeed with a strong GM with final roster say. IF Rhule comes back next year, it needs to be without final roster say. He did nothing to earn that and he's shown he shouldn't have been given it. Want to come back? That's gotta go.

Sam situation totally agree with..

But Players not playing up to the standards they have most of the season.. Is not...

Especially when I can see Easily.. They were in position to make those plays...

Which is what happened today...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...