Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam to Rhule after penalty thoughts?


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, rayzor said:

https://linguaholic.com/linguablog/say-less/

What does “say less” mean?

“Say less” is slang for “I understand” or “I get the gist of what you are saying.” You can also use it when you agree with someone and see eye to eye with them. In a sense, it’s a way of saying that no further explanation is needed.

Literally posted this on page 1 with no copy and paste needed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must have missed this, but I don't like Rhule saying "don't do it again". Not sure what his tone was or anything, but he himself said he wants the full Cam - and that's him.

That was a huge moment, worse penalties have occurred in the "DBO" error. That is a moment that has no affect, it's intimidating, warranted, and momentum building.

This reunion should be all about letting #1 be himself 100% as long as he's scoring TD's and getting W's.

Rhule should thank him for saving his job.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GOAT said:

I must have missed this, but I don't like Rhule saying "don't do it again". Not sure what his tone was or anything, but he himself said he wants the full Cam - and that's him.

That was a huge moment, worse penalties have occurred in the "DBO" error. That is a moment that has no affect, it's intimidating, warranted, and momentum building.

This reunion should be all about letting #1 be himself 100% as long as he's scoring TD's and getting W's.

Rhule should thank him for saving his job.

even cam said he understood and he wouldn't let it happen again.

we all know there's emotional players out there who would've let the energy get the beter of them for the detriment of the team. Cam did not. No need to defend him here. No need to criticize Cam here. 

Everyone got it. No one cared. Everyone loved it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, rico6 said:

Fair, but "mAh LiTersHipZ" is straight up tripe

The whole leadership argument(for or against) is completely ridiculous. It didn't help "lead" a team any more than it showed poor leadership.

At best, it got some of the players hyped up but they would have been hyped up had he took off his helmet or not.

The act itself was ultimately selfish but I completed understand the need and want to do so. Had the Panthers done the same thing to me, I probably wouldn't be nearly as nice with my celebration.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...