Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer says " We'll have to do something with Sam. "


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

The only reason we wouldn't make an offer for Watson when trading resumes is if Cam blows up and plays at a high level for the remainder of this season. If Cam plays poorly, then a good offer will be made for Watson. The Panthers clearly don't want to wait around until the 2024 draft to find a QB, and I don't either. Make it happen with Cam, or make it happen with Watson. Otherwise turn off the tv on Sunday because we are many seasons away from having anything decent on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Robby just needs to catch some passes and shut up. If he doesn't, there's a bench with his name on it and no one will cry.

 

I would like to trade Robby and his attitude while his value is somewhat high. Plus,he is so pencil thin i shutter every time he is tackled, just hoping he gets up.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

I would like to trade Robby and his attitude while his value is somewhat high. Plus,he is so pencil thin i shutter every time he is tackled, just hoping he gets up.

Robby's "attitude?" 

You do realize he has basically been the only one showing any real emotion when the offense isn't playing well, right? So, you would rather get rid of the guy that isn't just sitting down and taking it? 

That's like saying you would want to dump Cam or Steve Smith because they have an "attitude" problem on the sidelines.

I can understand the frustration with his performances but not the shots at his "attitude."

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Robby's "attitude?" 

You do realize he has basically been the only one showing any real emotion when the offense isn't playing well, right? So, you would rather get rid of the guy that isn't just sitting down and taking it? 

That's like saying you would want to dump Cam or Steve Smith because they have an "attitude" problem on the sidelines.

I can understand the frustration with his performances but not the shots at his "attitude."

Watch Robby go off last half of the season with cam. 
 

I know Robby has played abysmal with drops but Sam hasn’t given him ANY opportunities to play better. Dude has been open. I still think this is more of a Sam problem then Robby problem. Hope we cut Sam and bring in a capable backup and cam signs a multi year deal to stabilize this offense until we can draft the future and have Cam mentor him. What we should’ve done from day 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Funny enough, that’s how they used Mykel some of the time at UGA (and how him numbers weren’t high) he slid inside - they had Walker and would use guys like Wilson II, Wilson, or Harris across from Walker at the edge on passing downs.  
    • I will say this:  The Steelers used to be notorious for letting players go in what seemed to be their primes and that player would often begin their downward trajectory.  Barry Foster, for example, came to the Panthers from Pittsburgh and was a dud.  Kevin Greene shows the other side.  If Moton's knees are not as bad as thought, he could play another 4 seasons. If deteriorating knees leads to deteriorating performance, then we held the hot potato too long.  This is true with every player, and I have read articles about players on third contracts compared to first and second contracts and most NFL players seem to be overpaid--but OL tend to earn their money and hold up the best, based on my memory.  I do not care about how a player retires or how a player might feel if traded--that is part of the business and they are compensated very well.  I do, however, worry about the locker room; if players see vets getting sent to the slaughter house, it may impact their psyche.  So it is a delicate situation.  Moton is one of the high character, dependable, quality players on the roster. We have not worried about RT for nearly a decade (Flashback:  Super Bowl 50).  We have him under contract for another season and his knees are questionable, based on rumor. If you trade him based on his knees, you will not get value for him--the trade could get vetoed.  With his age, health, and contract situation, you are not getting more than a fourth rounder for him--not enough to replace his productivity.  There is a time when you try to squeeze a few more brushings out of the tooth paste tube and there is a time to throw it away.  Is there toothpaste left in the tube?  Yep.  Is it possible that the time to throw the tube away happens during the season?  Yep.  I understand the logic behind the OP's point and it is nothing that should solicit personal criticisms and rude reactions that are offensive.  Learn how to disagree.  However, if you see the problems other teams have at OT for years, etc. those of you wanting Moton to stay are also endorsing the idea of having a rookie OT on the right side in 2026, when this team should be competitive.  The coin has 2 sides.  I think you draft that RT this season (day 2) and you leave Moton there--but I get it if Morgan trades Moton for more picks to help us meet our needs. We need an edge, a S, and an OT right now--with Moton on the roster--in my view.  That player would develop and serve as depth (knees).  You don't draft for 2025 needs only.  These are 4-year contracts.  
    • The tinfoil hat version is they're waiting until after the draft so some teams think we might go OT in the draft? Idk lol 
×
×
  • Create New...