Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sooooo... What of PJ plays lights out Sunday?

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Geronimo Collaborator

Geronimo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Zod said:

Let's say PJ throws for 350 yards and 3 TDs with no turnovers. 

 

You start him against Washington and give Cam more time to learn the offense?

I doubt it.  He's 1 TD and 5 ints career so far and 2 of those pics were endzone pics in the same game lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
YourLastThought Mentor

YourLastThought

Posted
Posted

I say start Cam this Sunday. Screw it just go with it now if he wants to play. Give him the keys the rest of the season and just see what he can do and if he has anything left at all. if he does then keep him around another year.

I just hate for Cam being behind this offensive line. He will be running for his life. I hope he retires a Panther also. He was a great guy for the community of Charlotte and I absolutely LOVED how good he was with kids. He has a good heart and deserves more credit for being such a decent dude. His skills may not be what they once were possibly but it will be nice to see him in a Panthers uniform again.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Michael G Mentor

Michael G

Posted
Posted

If they start Cam this Sunday, that'll make two weeks in a row PJ has worked with the 1st team, getting those reps and preparing to play but gets shafted. I think PJ starts, gets a chance....loses even if he plays decent, and we start Cam against WFT. Even with Cam playing its unlikely we win Sunday. Why have Cam start with his hands tied (not knowing the playbook and rusty). Cam gets 1st team reps and more time to be ready and make a difference next week at home in front of fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BrianS
      Offensive Starters (Where are they found in the draft)

      By BrianS · Posted

      Something I find interesting is that you are more likely to find successful players as UDFA's than you are to find them with a single pick in any round past 3.  Those 3rd round compensatory choices?  Largely worthless.  Yes, I get it, there are a lot more UDFA's than there are drafted players in later rounds.  Basically, if you're fishing for starters you are simply not going to find anything in Rounds 4 - 7 with any regularity.
    • CRA
      Dan Morgan is an awful GM

      By CRA · Posted

      the argument that Dan Morgan was assistant GM for years while running counter to everything both his bosses signed off on (who look down at him and his staff for info).....is a tough sell.  I feel we do a variant of this every year.  You aren't this bad...becuase of 1 person.  You are this bad because of LOTS of bad people.  It was never just Joe Brady.  Which is why firing him didn't lead to better offense.  It was never just Matt Rhule.  It was never just Fitterer.    As bad as we are, we need to scorch Earth this puppy and quit letting people who were part of making the mess be the designed folks to lead us out of the mess.  when David Tepper and Jim Caldwell found the answer on the roster......it was clear from the jump nothing had really changed.   
    • Joe Bear
      Dan Morgan is an awful GM

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      "Buckaroo." That's good. 🤣👍 Mature beyond his years, clearly. Brian Burns was a far more justifiable asset to trade for a good return during the 2022 season, than DJ Moore (who was shipped out the following spring). Do you disagree? Let me know. I'd have traded Burns before McCaffrey, and I wouldn't have traded Moore at all. It's possible, despite what Morgan and Fitterer display, to turn down a bad offer. Thirty-one other teams are aware of this. That brings me to Johnson: if your "leverage" is "he wasn't gonna re-sign," you have no leverage; which, as you said, means you shouldn't make a trade, right? Do you disagree? If so, quickly adjust your prior stance. Giving up No. 1 in 6 and a standout WR, even if he's petulant, for No. 30-32 in 5 = demonstrably stupid. Keep the comp pick if he re-signs, or see if he can be convinced to stay with a new non-Shedeur QB.
×
×
  • Create New...