Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold Fractured Scapula on throwing shoulder


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, trueblade said:

This is the same medical staff that misdiagnosed Gano's injury. I don't have a lot of faith the medical staff handled this correct. Maybe misdiagnosed after ATL or misdiagnosed during the NE game.

Ummm no it’s not…

this is that medical staff

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2021/10/07/ryan-vermillion-washington-trainer-prescription-drugs/

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

When factoring all of this... Rhule's incompetence is fully visible.

NO BS, leading up to that game. I laid ALLLLLLL that out and said " NO chance Rhule starts him after getting no 1st team reps against the team that has Sam figured out. Rhule will fully protect Sam like he has since pre-season and not ruin him......" Rhule did just that, but also Sam also had a broken wing?? EVERYTHING was telling Rhule NOT to play Sam, why in wide world of sports did he??? Its like he wanted to royally screw up Sam......

HOLY LEE FUCCK WHAT ALL-TIME BLUNDER BY RHULE!!

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

If you didn’t think they would “find” another injury after taking another look, you’re not as smart as you think you are. 
 

You could see this coming when the boo birds came out on Sunday. Darnold is done. 

Yeah I’m smarter than this coaching staff. After saying before game they was worried about his shoulder then playing him and the way he looked the whole game. It’s bad when my 11 year old girl is smarter than u and said daddy something isn’t right with Darnold. It’s ok Tepper we know ur garbage along with ur garbage coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, trueblade said:

This is the same medical staff that misdiagnosed Gano's injury. I don't have a lot of faith the medical staff handled this correct. Maybe misdiagnosed after ATL or misdiagnosed during the NE game.

Different staff. Same poo.

That staff is in Washington and under investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Yeah I’m smarter than this coaching staff. After saying before game they was worried about his shoulder then playing him and the way he looked the whole game. It’s bad when my 11 year old girl is smarter than u and said daddy something isn’t right with Darnold. It’s ok Tepper we know ur garbage along with ur garbage coach.

You’re embarrassing yourself, Cam. Maybe someone will pick you up soon. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

No one knows when this occurred but naturally everyone is gonna say Rhule knew when we have no proof he did.

He held CMC out for as long as needed and didn’t run him into the ground.

 

I mean we have Sam Darnold acknowledging the injury in the post game Sunday.   And it had already been looked into and discussed prior to the game.  It was hurt on that Atlanta hit.  It was reported on leading up to the game.  Which is why he was forced to take questions on it after the game.  It’s why he could clarify it was new and different injury and not a re-aggregation of an old injury to that shoulder.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just following up: I looked at the tape earlier today from the game—this was the only play from the second quarter in which Sam was contacted by defender. Certainly not saying this caused the injury, but multiple sources are claiming they believe this issue happened in the second quarter. 

To Joe’s point, here’s a look back at what happened the prior Sunday in Atlanta: 
 

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean we have Sam Darnold acknowledging the injury in the post game Sunday.   And it had already been looked into and discussed prior to the game.  It was hurt on that Atlanta hit.  It was reported on leading up to the game.  Which is why he was forced to take questions on it after the game.  It’s why he could clarify it was new and different injury and not a re-aggregation of an old injury to that shoulder.  
 

Looking like it’s an aggravation according to Person which would make most sense.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...