Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why we will upset on Sunday


CammyCamLoveDaKidz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sunday is November 14 ...

Carolina is 13-5 all-time (including playoffs) vs. Arizona - Carolina can get it's 14th win vs. AZ on the 14th - with QB #14 (yes, #14 will start, and rebound)

Also, it's week 10 - Rhule can pick up 10th win as Panthers Head Coach

Jacksonville got their 9th win all-time vs. Buffalo in week 9

Carolina's rotation number this week is 257 - the 55th prime number, signaling we'll become 5-5

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
  • Poo 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CammyCamLoveDaKidz said:

Sunday is November 14 ...

Carolina is 13-5 all-time (including playoffs) vs. Arizona - Carolina can get it's 14th win vs. AZ on the 14th - with QB #14 (yes, #14 will start, and rebound)

Also, it's week 10 - Rhule can pick up 10th win as Panthers Head Coach

Jacksonville got their 9th win all-time vs. Buffalo in week 9

Carolina's rotation number this week is 257 - the 55th prime number, signaling we'll become 5-5

Some body studies Gematria I see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

31-6 with Darnold starting

34-13 with PJ starting

 

We lose either way.

Realistically, got to see who the Cardinals put on the field to predict final scores at this point.   I mean, no Murray, Nuk, Edmonds, etc? Defense having a great game paired with a wildcat might could keep the score down. 

But I do expect Sam to be trotted back out so I guess they will have to let him pass at some point after AZ builds a lead.    And then, well, we all know what happens at that point. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...