An ESPN analytic stat shows just how bad our offensive line really is.

[joemac]

2 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Because Brady and Darnold will be gone, and money talks.

Replaced with whom, exactly?

[BlackPanther21_]

Just now, joemac said:

Replaced with whom, exactly?

Any motherfugger that can at least be competent at QB and make decent decisions. 

[tiger7_88]

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

FO DVOA rankings disagree.

We have had worse OL's than this.

Sad but true.

Likely some Cam played behind (remembering the days when MoRon was playing DT at RT).

[AU-panther]

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Look at the bottom half of the league…

the #1 pass O is #28 in pass block win rate 

the #6 pass O is #27 

the #10 pass O is #22 

the #3 pass O is #19  

the #9 pass O is #21 

It’s almost like we have a QB problem and OLs not holding is just the NFL to a large degree 

The oline is bad but its distracting everyone from the main problem on this team.

[Brooklyn 3.0]

With a good O-Line we'd easily be 5-4.

[Basbear]

9 minutes ago, joemac said:

Why TF would anybody want to come be a part of this dumpster fire of an offense?!

[TheRumGone]

Just now, AU-panther said:

The oline is bad but its distracting everyone from the main problem on this team.

They would look better with a better qb but yes the main problem is Sam Darnold. 
 

We still need to invest in the oline obviously but qb should be priority #1

[joemac]

4 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Any motherfugger that can at least be competent at QB and make decent decisions. 

Yeah those guys mostly already have jobs. Maybe we get lucky and Watson waives his clause for us? I doubt it though. Unfortunately the way things are going, we’re gonna be in Cleveland Browns type QB purgatory for a long ass time. I hope I’m wrong…

[SCO96]

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Look at the bottom half of the league…

the #1 pass O is #28 in pass block win rate 

the #6 pass O is #27 

the #10 pass O is #22 

the #3 pass O is #19  

the #9 pass O is #21 

It’s almost like we have a QB problem and OLs not holding is just the NFL to a large degree 

This is why it's hard for me to fully embrace analytics. They don't tell the whole story. According to the numbers the Cowboy o-line is just a little bit better than our in terms of pass blocking. I think we all would agree that isn't the case. But, we also know that our line doesn't hold blocks very long. It's one of the reasons why Darnold seems to always be on the run. Perhaps other teams have QB's that do a better job getting the ball out of the QB's hand in a timely manner in terms of their schemes.

What this does show us is that we do not have dependable blockers in our passing and rushing game.

[rippadonn]

Just now, SCO96 said:

This is why it's hard for me to fully embrace analytics. They don't tell the whole story. According to the numbers the Cowboy o-line is just a little bit better than our in terms of pass blocking. I think we all would agree that isn't the case. But, we also know that our line doesn't hold blocks very long. It's one of the reasons why Darnold seems to always be on the run. Perhaps other teams have QB's that do a better job getting the ball out of the QB's hand in a timely manner in terms of their schemes.

What this does show us is that we do not have dependable blockers in our passing and rushing game.

Math is everything but it's not football. Any given Sunday has proven that again and again.

[tiger7_88]

7 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah those guys mostly already have jobs.

Yeah, that's why you FUGGING DRAFT THEM and not try to pick off bargains in the FA market (or low-cost trades who are low-cost FOR A FUGGING REASON).

Again, this ain't fugging NFL rocket science.

Edited November 9, 2021 by tiger7_88

[CRA]

7 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

This is why it's hard for me to fully embrace analytics. They don't tell the whole story. According to the numbers the Cowboy o-line is just a little bit better than our in terms of pass blocking. I think we all would agree that isn't the case. But, we also know that our line doesn't hold blocks very long. It's one of the reasons why Darnold seems to always be on the run. Perhaps other teams have QB's that do a better job getting the ball out of the QB's hand in a timely manner in terms of their schemes.

What this does show us is that we do not have dependable blockers in our passing and rushing game.

No doubt numbers lie and deceive at times.   But there is a lot of bad OL play week to week.  And a lot to QBs making it work.  

[Basbear]

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

FO DVOA rankings disagree.

We have had worse OL's than this.

Sad but true.

I told you I needed to see them play and have. They are about were ESPN has them 28-32, huge step back form last year were they ended up mid-pack(solid). Honestly small things are killing them along with just lacking talent- Snap count,  firing off the ball, missing gaps, etc. Honestly I know they play as "1"..... The "1 group" plays dumb, lost, and confused. They need better preparation in the worst way, that would help move the group to the very late teens along with having a experienced OC calling plays with OL that lacks talent.  Many times after the snap 2-3 defenders are already in the tackle box, thus Sam has jet flashbacks and gos hero ball mode....played out that way since week 4. This staffs has no answers and that is the worst part. 

[mav1234]

3 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

Yeah, that's why you FUGGING DRAFT THEM and not try to pick off bargains in the FA market.

Again, this ain't fugging NFL rocket science.

The issue with this staff is their incredible hubris to think they can resurrect people's careers. Just because they got more than expected out of a few players last year the staff bought into their own bullshit and decided to try to build an entire OL and raise a QB from the dead. It's insane.