Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Desperate times call for desperate measures


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Was a 4th round pick last year. Was pretty good at FIU. Has been on the practice squad since Week 1. Didn’t do bad during the Jets preseason. 2 TDs no INTs and 60% comp I think

Yeah and now we've seen the Jets backup White look pretty good it makes more sense why they didn't keep Morgan.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toker Smurf said:

Yeah and now we've seen the Jets backup White look pretty good it makes more sense why they didn't keep Morgan.

I feel like Morgan and Darnold are friends and they signed Morgan because he's probably a smart guy and servers as an extra set of eyes for Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

Abdullah?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

Sam is out there at practice right now, suited up, so its not 100% hes not gonna play on Sunday

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

I would cream my jeans over that load distribution. Pun intended.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toker Smurf said:

Definitely could be, I was just pointing out that just because the Jets cut him, he may not be utter garbage.

I'd love to see what he has, tbh.  It's not like PJ is our answer at backup let alone starter.

Ofc if Darnold is ready that's a moot point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually hope PJ starts.  Rhule needs to see without a doubt that PJ is not an NFL QB.  This staff needs to see that it's not OK to go into a season without a real backup.  If you want to develop someone, make that developmental guy your THIRD QB.  Not your first or second.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Random,  if the Giants do take Carter... and try to trade Kayvon...  I would think about it. If Sanders gets to 8 and they want to trade up from 3(I know that's far) by adding Kayvon and pick swaps in next couple rds and a future 1st or 2nd maybe... Id be game. They pick at the top of each rd, so we'd get talent spill over, a pass rusher with yout/ skill and still have that 34 pick to get a wr etc. 
    • Those guys you mentioned are ILB at the next level. They will be really good too. We could use any of them and like you I hope we can get one of them later on in the draft. The teams need on defense is great than the amount of picks they have. If they are sticking with the 3-4 base they will need another ILB and a OLB that can play DE in 4-3 packages. The front 7 is far from complete and the secondary will not get every need addressed this offseason. The talent is just not going to be available when we are picking I'm afraid. 
    • There are very few players in this draft that don't have a concern that could cause someone to not like them---I think the longer a player hangs around the top 10 (beginning in February) the more their flaws could withstand the scrutiny. Some fall too far, in my opinion, and are thrown into the scratch and dent bin.  Jack Sawyer (Ohio State) comes to mind, Shavon Revel (East Carolina), Restrepo (Miami).  I wonder if it is not that we found things through research, it could be that we exploited trivial things.  You can't measure the "it" factor. Those three just mentioned--I would have no problem drafting them at a discount.  Restrepo ran a 4.8--not as big a deal as people think--he is going to be a chain-moving slot--he will be sliding underneath, finding a hole in the zone, etc.  Great hands, great attitude.  I take him in the fourth.  Jack Sawyer is the high motor over-achiever.  I think he can be a 8-10 sack guy, block a lot of passes, and hold the edge.  I take him in round 3 if they let him fall that far.  Revel could be one of the top 3 CBs--if he is there at 58, I take him.  When the flaw is what you see when you hear their names, you are blind to their other talents.
×
×
  • Create New...