Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Desperate times call for desperate measures


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Was a 4th round pick last year. Was pretty good at FIU. Has been on the practice squad since Week 1. Didn’t do bad during the Jets preseason. 2 TDs no INTs and 60% comp I think

Yeah and now we've seen the Jets backup White look pretty good it makes more sense why they didn't keep Morgan.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toker Smurf said:

Yeah and now we've seen the Jets backup White look pretty good it makes more sense why they didn't keep Morgan.

I feel like Morgan and Darnold are friends and they signed Morgan because he's probably a smart guy and servers as an extra set of eyes for Darnold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

Abdullah?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

Sam is out there at practice right now, suited up, so its not 100% hes not gonna play on Sunday

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, unicar15 said:

It’ll be PJ  bc they’re going to want to him to rub. I honestly can’t think of a worse game for CMC to be activated back. They’re going to run it 50x against the Pats. I hope our RBs are ready. I bet the carries breakdown will be:

CMC - 18

Hubbard - 15

Freeman - 8

Walker - 7

WRs - 3
 

Run it into the ground…

I would cream my jeans over that load distribution. Pun intended.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Toker Smurf said:

Definitely could be, I was just pointing out that just because the Jets cut him, he may not be utter garbage.

I'd love to see what he has, tbh.  It's not like PJ is our answer at backup let alone starter.

Ofc if Darnold is ready that's a moot point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually hope PJ starts.  Rhule needs to see without a doubt that PJ is not an NFL QB.  This staff needs to see that it's not OK to go into a season without a real backup.  If you want to develop someone, make that developmental guy your THIRD QB.  Not your first or second.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...