Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Play calling was fine.IMO


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Why didn't we run the no huddle stuff with Jake calling the plays that worked so well against ATL? There was none of that after the first drive. Pretty stupid to bail on what works.
:mad2: Because Fox hates to stay with something that works for us to help us win instead of lossing. We seem to win when Dwill and stewart carries most of the game. But when weak onearmed Jake gets more throws then he should we end up lossing to a sorry a$$ team like the Fins.:puke:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. Jake should not throw 40 times. When he already threw for 20 times going into the 3rd quarter that should have been how many he threw at the end of the game.

Don't sit there and tell me it was "fine" playcalling when we stopped running the ball where DWill was averaging 9 yards a run. Don't tell me it made sense to keep passing, where we were averaging less yards per pass play than a run play! Get out of here.....

we had to get the passing game going.Both teams were running the ball well.but we cant run the ball every single down.we do have to pass some.We have been missing the big plays all season.If we hade a #2 WR and a better QB..nobody would be crying about the playcalling now.because it was not that bad.yes some were stupid.execution is more of the problem.any decent offense would have won that game with the same plays called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we had to get the passing game going.Both teams were running the ball well.but we cant run the ball every single down.we do have to pass some.We have been missing the big plays all season.If we hade a #2 WR and a better QB..nobody would be crying about the playcalling now.because it was not that bad.yes some were stupid.execution is more of the problem.any decent offense would have won that game with the same plays called.

why did we "have" to get it going? B/c it was just too easy on the ground???Every drive stalled once the pass got involved. The big plays come from the ground game.....a game Fox has turned his back on the majority of the season despite it working.

we have a poo QB therefore it is poor playcalling to attempt a balanced attack....ESPECIALLY when you don't need to and have the ability to dominate a team like Miami on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why did we "have" to get it going? B/c it was just too easy on the ground???Every drive stalled once the pass got involved. The big plays come from the ground game.....a game Fox has turned his back on the majority of the season despite it working.

we have a poo QB therefore it is poor playcalling to attempt a balanced attack....ESPECIALLY when you don't need to and have the ability to dominate a team like Miami on the ground.

are you seriously asking me why we had to get the passing game going??Because its not the 50s,you have to have foward passing..You need big plays from the passing game and ground game..

We need a balanced attack...a QB that can execute

Link to comment
Share on other sites

are you seriously asking me why we had to get the passing game going??Because its not the 50s,you have to have foward passing..You need big plays from the passing game and ground game..

We need a balanced attack...a QB that can execute

we don't have a QB. that is reality.

The ONLY way we win is when we take him out of games......otherwise we lose. It is what it is. Atlanta was an exception to the norm. We have to play 50's football with Jake.....and Carolina can win doing it. They could have won last night b/c Miami couldn't stop the run....they weren't even close to stopping it.

We did not need big plays from the passing game last night. Attempting to get those cost them the game. Are dink and dunk attempt is all we should have seen and Carolina would be at .500 today. Sure, that ain't gonna get the Panthers anywhere in the long run....but that is the only option as long as Jake is the choice at QB. The gameplan for AZ was the blueprint for the rest of the season.....they failed last night and went back to the Philly gameplan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we don't have a QB. that is reality.

The ONLY way we win is when we take him out of games......otherwise we lose. It is what it is. Atlanta was an exception to the norm. We have to play 50's football with Jake.....and Carolina can win doing it. They could have won last night b/c Miami couldn't stop the run....they weren't even close to stopping it.

We did not need big plays from the passing game last night. Attempting to get those cost them the game. Are dink and dunk attempt is all we should have seen and Carolina would be at .500 today. Sure, that ain't gonna get the Panthers anywhere in the long run....but that is the only option as long as Jake is the choice at QB. The gameplan for AZ was the blueprint for the rest of the season.....they failed last night and went back to the Philly gameplan.

Did you just say it is what it is...Ok CRA i see..you want us to play 50s football..in 2009 when you have to make a foward pass and you want us to take the most important postion on offense out the game..ok CRA...in fact you do need the big play from the running game and passing game..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you just say it is what it is...Ok CRA i see..you want us to play 50s football..in 2009 when you have to make a foward pass and you want us to take the most important postion on offense out the game..ok CRA...in fact you do need the big play from the running game and passing game..

Is this Fox? Are you trying to explain your play calling? Thank GOD I finally found you. YOUR an IDIOT! Play calling sucked because the QB (as you well know) doesn't have the arm to throw. You as the Head Coach should know this! If your bound and determined to keep Jake in the game... then run lots and lots more than throw. I understand the thinking that the Pass sets up the run... thing is, we have a awesome run and don't really need alot to set it up... on the other hand... our passing game kinda stinks. With that out of the way... please clean up your act. If you insist on passing, get a QB that can do it (since your in charge of that, that shouldn't be such a chore).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is this fox? Are you trying to explain your play calling? Thank god i finally found you. Your an idiot! Play calling sucked because the qb (as you well know) doesn't have the arm to throw. You as the head coach should know this! If your bound and determined to keep jake in the game... Then run lots and lots more than throw. I understand the thinking that the pass sets up the run... Thing is, we have a awesome run and don't really need alot to set it up... On the other hand... Our passing game kinda stinks. With that out of the way... Please clean up your act. If you insist on passing, get a qb that can do it (since your in charge of that, that shouldn't be such a chore).

cra???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you just say it is what it is...Ok CRA i see..you want us to play 50s football..in 2009 when you have to make a foward pass and you want us to take the most important postion on offense out the game..ok CRA...in fact you do need the big play from the running game and passing game..

No I don't "want" to play 50's football.....however, Carolina has no choice but to do that if they want to win as long as Jake as the QB.

You can either use the gameplan and logic of the Philly or Miami games....and lose. Or take Jake out of it like against AZ and play 50's football and have a shot. I don't like or want to play that kind of football......but it is absurd not to when Jake is at QB and given the strengths of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...