Sam

[Brooklyn 3.0]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Have you been watching him play? About half his INTs this year have gone through the hands of receivers before getting picked.

So it CAN be a WRs fault?

[mwright350]

This calling players expendable as it relates to them getting injured poo is shameful. 

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

So it CAN be a WRs fault?

Absolutely. Our receivers have dropped a poo ton of balls this year. They haven't been a cause of an INT though.

[Brooklyn 3.0]

I for one am SHOCKED ... shocked I tell you that when the O-Line plays well, the QB can have a good game.

[therealmjl]

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Absolutely. Our receivers have dropped a poo ton of balls this year. They haven't been a cause of an INT though.

Yet. That will happen soon enough.

[iamhubby1]

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

So it CAN be a WRs fault?

Only for QBs he likes.

 

[kungfoodude]

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Defend your position. 

He threw the ball well. 

He ran the ball well. 

He checked into several good plays.

 

What exactly did you have a problem with today?

He was the same guy he has always been. 

If you are crowing about a 13/24 for 129 yds and no TD's....I mean, I don't know what to say. 

Name any average QB in the NFL that would be acceptable.

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I for one am SHOCKED ... shocked I tell you that when the O-Line plays well, the QB can have a good game.

The OL played like steaming hot trash and our gameplan was specifically designed to deemphasized the passing game. 

[iamhubby1]

1 minute ago, mwright350 said:

This calling players expendable as it relates to them getting injured poo is shameful. 

 

A lot of people have noticed this post. I wonder if anything will come of it? I've seen him post worse though.

[frankw]

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

He threw the ball well. 

He ran the ball well. 

He checked into several good plays.

The Panthers running backs had a total of 39 rushing attempts and Sam added in 8 more himself. It's pretty clear the gameplan was to limit Sam's passing attempts and in turn those costly turnovers. What is there to dispute?

[Brooklyn 3.0]

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The OL played like steaming hot trash and our gameplan was specifically designed to deemphasized the passing game. 

Uh ... what? 0 sacks ... 203 yds on the ground. Are you drunk?

[TLGPanthersFan]

1 hour ago, Actionman0z said:

Sam was precautionary. I bet he is fine. 

Not precautionary. He is in the protocol.

[LinvilleGorge]

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He was the same guy he has always been. 

If you are crowing about a 13/24 for 129 yds and no TD's....I mean, I don't know what to say. 

Name any average QB in the NFL that would be acceptable.

@glenwo2 nailed it. What Sam did today that has folks raving is that he didn't turn it over. At this point, that alone basically qualifies as a "good game".

[CRA]

3 hours ago, frankw said:

I'm happy with his effort and he bounced back well enough but Joe Brady has to understand he does not have Cam Newton. Do not put your qb in jeopardy when you have a run game going like we did with Chuba and Abdullah.

That’s Sam running dumb more than anything getting blown up like that.   Sam taking that shots running isn’t on Joe Brady.  Basically no matter what you ask him to do….he doesn’t have the head of a QB.