Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold was terrible first half of 2019 but then...


cranky
 Share

Recommended Posts

Darnold missed part of the early 2019 season and when he came back he threw only 1TD to 3 Ints and the Jets went 1-3. However, over the last eight games of that season, he threw 13 TD's to only 4 Ints and the Jets went 6-2. And this was against the Bills, Ravens and Pittsburg so they weren't exactly against weak teams. Don't be surprised if he bounces back here as well.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cranky said:

Darnold missed part of the early 2019 season and when he came back he threw only 1TD to 3 Ints and the Jets went 1-3. However, over the last eight games of that season, he threw 13 TD's to only 4 Ints and the Jets went 6-2. And this was against the Bills, Ravens and Pittsburg so they weren't exactly against weak teams. Don't be surprised if he bounces back here as well.

I like they way you're thinking.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cranky said:

Darnold missed part of the early 2019 season and when he came back he threw only 1TD to 3 Ints and the Jets went 1-3. However, over the last eight games of that season, he threw 13 TD's to only 4 Ints and the Jets went 6-2. And this was against the Bills, Ravens and Pittsburg so they weren't exactly against weak teams. Don't be surprised if he bounces back here as well.

 

Well now, that' is good information. Let us hope history is willing to repeat itself.

 

My only advice to you? "Duck and Cover" Cuz this may not go over well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...