Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: league and team sources expect Panthers to active the Deshaun Watson trade talks


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

What do these fugging idiots get that it’s not the answer.

 

1. As soon as he moves the NFL is putting him on the commissioners list- only reason he’s not is because Houston isn’t playing him.

2. We are going to trade good capital away and a chunk of salary cap for a QB and not be able to address the OL.

3. He knows zero about the playbook and has zero chemistry with anyone on the team, so won’t see any real results this year IF we don’t get him killed from playing behind this OL this season.

4. The horrible, horrible PR behind this.

5. What happens if he’s guilty, goes to jail, or gets suspended for a year or two and we are out of the capital we traded for him and him.

You guys are a bunch of idiots. 

Edited by Cdparr7
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherMan89 said:

At least this is now being reported by those that actually cover the Panthers. I know people thoughts on Joe but would say this is more legitimate than what we’ve heard the last few weeks. 

This one is where an actual Panthers dedicated reporter is outright saying it and not alluding to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

Ohh fun. An embarrassing protest every game is really going to improve the game day experience I guess.

Not to make light of the situation, because if he is a predator, that is no laughing matter, but to be fair, there should already be protests against Darnold's horrible play and the fact we traded a 2nd round pick for him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yes, let's kick this poo show into maximum overdrive. Watching us trade a king's ransom for Watson just to watch him immediately end up on the commissioner's exempt list would be maximum entertainment around here.

And indicated, don’t forget about that part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...