Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear David Tepper


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I’m not even mad at giving Darnold a chance. I didn’t agree with it, but sure I get he was cheap with some potential. Not having a plan B is my issue. Going all in on Darnold was a terrible mistake…

I not only wanted Minshew after we got Darnold, I wanted him before we ever got Darnold.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Rhule is a real culture builder huh. Got the Giants hyped 

Whatever happens to Rhule is of his own doing but fug that guy and anybody still crying about him as far as I'm concerned. He isnt a Panther and the Giants just whooped our asses I'm tired of reading about his sob story he's got a 14 million dollar contract get over it and enjoy NY.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/20/2021 at 10:28 AM, Catsfan69 said:

It's also football 101 to come back to the ball when your QB scrambles. 

Robby never seems to come back for the ball does he?

Most of our recievers don't seem to follow standard scramble protocols.

 

2 hours ago, hepcat said:

I think the problem is Tepper knows nothing about building a football team but he’s way too involved in the team dynamic

Tepper is about to have a come to Jesus meeting with his investors otherwise known as his season ticket holders and high priced suite swans who wine and dine corporate America when we lose to a 1-5 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You went all in on the wrong horse, Dave.

It's spiraling out of control.

Which horse , Rhule ,, has to be Rhule if you say “ all in “ ..

alternate choice is Darnold ,, he’s not “ all in “ on Darnold , since it’s a short contract .. 

Maybe you mean he picked the wrong Tara Card reader ??

My bet is that you mean it’s Rhule ..  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

Which horse , Rhule ,, has to be Rhule if you say “ all in “ ..

alternate choice is Darnold ,, he’s not “ all in “ on Darnold , since it’s a short contract .. 

Maybe you mean he picked the wrong Tara Card reader ??

My bet is that you mean it’s Rhule ..  

 

Rhule. He's the shot caller here. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah the thing about DJ and his production was that he played in a scheme that either rushed 6 or rushed 3. Almost nothing in between.  So he's either 1 on 1 or a free rusher OR he's not rushing at all.  That said, he cost very little compared to Burns with basically the same output. 
    • There's much of nothing coming out this time of year, but here's a vid that I believe that many fans need to internalize because it speaks to expectations for the 2024 season.    There's nothing really new, but I'd like to point out that one of the few things that I personally learned is that D.J. Wonnum's contract is only guaranteed to the tune of 10 percent. The analyst in the vid is a Vikings guy, and he has seen all of  Wonnum's plays. He says that Wonnum disappears for big stretches, and of course, as a Panthers guy, I couldn't help but think of Brian Burns' disappearing act for stretches as well.  To paraphrase and kind of give my two cents, Panthers fans should be somewhat optimistic about all of the potential on offense (but not crazily so), and be somewhat worried about the pass rush and defensive backfield. We're thin at both, but hopefully we can at least be competitive based on the offensive side of the ball. This is not to say that we won't be better on defense, but being so thin at rush and on the back end, we will be lucky to substantially improve.  One more note is that I believe he's somewhat of a Young apologist, as he didn't really mention Bryce's bad play specifically, taking the position that we just don't know what we have in Young based upon the sh¡t show in 2023.  I could argue the point, but what's the point? We'll have to see what Bryce has got when surrounded by much-improved talent and coaching. Check the vid out; it isn't so long, and though there are multiple reasons to be skeptical about the defensive personnel, last year produced a couple of stats that should indicate that Ej knows what he's doing. Like the analyst said, we'll hopefully do for the defense in the 2025 off-season, what we did for the offense this off-season.
    • seems like Necas is acting like a pestilent spoiled brat, we have to sign Drury and this is gumming up the works - also looks like we now have to trade Necas for draft picks or fingers crossed get out of KK's salary
×
×
  • Create New...