Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predictions - Panthers at Giants


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

This'll be a get right game for us, I think we'll beat them soundly and convicingly. 

Panthers: 23

Giants: 6

An already dreadful team missing a lot of its starters,I think we'll come out amped. Our D will dominate, the offense will still have its hiccups and I would bet a good amount of their points come off turnovers inside Giants territory. We lost to two teams with a superior roster; only truly bad loss was that damn Philly one. If we do somehow manage to lose this, we will be in free fall and I'll start to become worried about us potentially undershooting the 8-9 win mark. That'd be a worst case scenario.

Alternatively, we'll do what CRA suggested and dominate the game in the yards category but miss oppourtunities on crucial downs and as a result never go up as much as we feel we should similarly to the Jets game. Could see either happening.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Think it similar to the Philly game in some aspects.

D dominates early vs a bad offense and sets up an easy win.    We never get up as much as we feel we should be. Staff does try to get an even rush/pass split that leans slightly to the run.  Which prevents the turnovers we saw vs Philly.   Chuba grinds out a good but unspectacular game.  

23 - 13 Panthers 

Their offense appears to be a MASH unit. We should dominate on D but this O will be the equalizer in a rather ugly game. I think we get this one by a FG but it wouldn’t surprise me either if we lose by same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

Their offense appears to be a MASH unit. We should dominate on D but this O will be the equalizer in a rather ugly game. I think we get this one by a FG but it wouldn’t surprise me either if we lose by same.

Last time we faced a trash NY team….we barely squeaked by in reality.  
 

I got faith the D can setup a win.  I just don’t know if the O can do their part.   Just too inconsistent.    And turnovers are clearly becoming a real issue.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CRA said:

Last time we faced a trash NY team….we barely squeaked by in reality.  
 

I got faith the D can setup a win.  I just don’t know if the O can do their part.   Just too inconsistent.    And turnovers are clearly becoming a real issue.  

28th in the NFL in turnover margin. That isn't gonna result in many wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...