Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Our 1K Yard Receivers From Last Season Are Being Wasted By Darnold's Horrible Play


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

How did Sam complete that long bomb to DJ in that final drive?  

I'm still trying to figure it out because Sam is so inaccurate with the deep ball in the first place.  

Sam's timing is off on deep balls but I think when he plays instead of thinks he can make some incredible throws.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Sam's timing is off on deep balls but I think when he plays instead of thinks he can make some incredible throws.

It looked almost like he Russel-Wilson'd that deep ball where he just chucked it up but ended up being so damn on-target.  lol.

He should try doing that again and instead of aiming for the target he should just chuck it deep with plenty of air to it.... 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Cam had no LT but had elite interior play it's not the same at all. 

Kalil/Turner/Norwell - 5x pro bowl, 2x 1st T-AllPro / 5x pro Bowl/ 1st T-All Pro

It's well beyond baffling that people are trying to compare these lines and yet at the time we still blamed the OL when Cam played poorly and a lot of that was true as well just like now except exponentially worse.

Wilson has had no OL and is one of the few who can escape like Houdini and that's it. Ain't no just deal with a historically bad OL when there has only been one guy who could maybe do it but yet in still his team is poo too now and they only won 1 SB so clearly they would have been better served to go ahead and get an OL. He also just fuged up his finger real good due to pressure up the middle.

Cam still stood strong in the pocket and delivered during horrible stretches of oline play. He didn’t act scared, he made it work more often then not. Also Cam made the olines better than they were because he was an escape artist and hard to bring down. Ask those guys who played with Cam. They will all tell you he made life easier for them. He helped those guys make pro bowls. 
 

again nobody here is saying the oline doesn’t need an upgrade but you cannot overlook that Darnold is the absolute worst qb in the league in clean pockets over the past 4 years. Stop ignoring the obvious. Dude does not have what it takes. 2 sacks Sunday were on the oline. Nowhere for Darnold to go to. That happens to qbs on sundays every single Sunday even with some of the top olines in the league. Otherwise the line was fine You guys are expecting perfection that is never going to come. It’s not Darnold it’s the oline. It’s not Darnold it’s Brady. Darnold just sucks. Deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robby had a terrible game this past Sunday. Other than that, I blame Darnold for Robby’s slow start this season. Panthers fans put a lot of the blame on Teddy Bridgwater last season but he didn’t have a problem finding Robby or Moore at all. Robby went from catching 95 balls to 15 this season through six games. 

Edited by Squid Game
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Squid Game said:

Robby had a terrible game this past Sunday. Other than that, I blame Darnold for Robby’s slow start this season. Panthers fans put a lot of the blame on Teddy Bridgwater last season but he didn’t have a problem finding Robby or Moore at all. Robby went from catching 95 balls to 15 this season through six games. 

For one, DJ Moore is getting more of the shorter routes, which may explain why he’s getting 29% of the targets compared to 17% for Anderson. Last season, Anderson got 27% compared to 22% for Moore.

https://www.espn.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/35556/carolina-panthers-wr-robby-anderson-and-qb-sam-darnold-still-searching-for-chemistry-they-had-with-ny-jets

You should put more blame on Brady for changing what was working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

For one, DJ Moore is getting more of the shorter routes, which may explain why he’s getting 29% of the targets compared to 17% for Anderson. Last season, Anderson got 27% compared to 22% for Moore.

https://www.espn.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/35556/carolina-panthers-wr-robby-anderson-and-qb-sam-darnold-still-searching-for-chemistry-they-had-with-ny-jets

You should put more blame on Brady for changing what was working.

I understand it’s Brady’s fault too but he isn’t the one playing QB. The receiving core was supposed to be our strongest at the beginning of the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Squid Game said:

I understand it’s Brady’s fault too but he isn’t the one playing QB. The receiving core was supposed to be our strongest at the beginning of the season. 

Its better than it has been but it's been having drop issues since camp... And not just for Darnold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have 3 players in the top 10 in drops while Miami is the only other team with more than 1 and they both are tied with Chuba for drops. Robby leads the league and DJ is tied for 2nd. Sam has made some baffling throws and can't hit the broadside of a barn on anything over 20 yards but our receivers have not been good either.

https://scores.nbcsports.com/fb/leaders.asp?type=Receiving&range=NFL&rank=232

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CarolinaSock said:

We have 3 players in the top 10 in drops while Miami is the only other team with more than 1 and they both are tied with Chuba for drops. Robby leads the league and DJ is tied for 2nd. Sam has made some baffling throws and can't hit the broadside of a barn on anything over 20 yards but our receivers have not been good either.

https://scores.nbcsports.com/fb/leaders.asp?type=Receiving&range=NFL&rank=232

Well I mean...he did hit Ian Thomas for 40+ on that final drive if we're going to be accurate......

But your point is for the most part, accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...