Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule says the Panthers offense is about to have a "vastly different look," redefined with more of an emphasis on the run game.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jackie Lee said:

It's pretty dumb, but our run game was working and we just stopped doing it in the 2nd quarter when it was a 2 point game. I think most teams try to run and keep doing it til it's not working. They aren't telling people exactly who is going to run where on the field but it's also obvious running outside is our strongest option. It can at least get teams out of man coverage instead of Brady beating a dead horse 

He should have ran the ball until they proved they could stop it. It was working but for some reason Brady said hold my beer.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherj said:

Yeah Teddy was a beast with horizontal offense, but that gets clogged up in the redzone. Teddy needed a monster to toss the ball up to high in the endzone, or something, but our receivers were too small. Still if you went man on us Teddy would just eat you up with DJ and company at mid-field. We were dead in the water once we got to the redzone.

Yea TB strength is just that can't take that away just like you can't take away Darnold can score TDs in the redzone. We did say in another thread if we could combine them two like Captain Planet or some poo we may be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

It's pretty dumb, but our run game was working and we just stopped doing it in the 2nd quarter when it was a 2 point game. I think most teams try to run and keep doing it til it's not working. They aren't telling people exactly who is going to run where on the field but it's also obvious running outside is our strongest option. It can at least get teams out of man coverage instead of Brady beating a dead horse 

Chubba is not good at running outside. He doesn't have the speed you need to get around the edge. That means that we are going to north and south Chubba until he is almost certainly injured. Expect Chubba to be injured going north and south this Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Chubba is not good at running outside. He doesn't have the speed you need to get around the edge. That means that we are going to north and south Chubba until he is almost certainly injured. Expect Chubba to be injured going north and south this Sunday.

That's is not accurate at all.  For some reason they are not trying to run those plays.  Brady is just not allowing him to get in a rhythm but the kid is fast and can get around the edge if given just a hint of a block just like CMC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

That's is not accurate at all.  For some reason they are not trying to run those plays.  Brady is just not allowing him to get in a rhythm but the kid is fast and can get around the edge if given just a hint of a block just like CMC.

I’m very confused. Chubba best asset is breaking it outside. He can’t power back, catch or block at this point. Why are people hating on him for the one thing he’s good at?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

That's is not accurate at all.  For some reason they are not trying to run those plays.  Brady is just not allowing him to get in a rhythm but the kid is fast and can get around the edge if given just a hint of a block just like CMC.

I've seen him lose foot races around the edge with not so fast LBs. That is why the coaching staff doesn't want to use him like that imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Hubbard’s speed is fine.  I think his lower body needs more muscle.  I remember CMC struggling with first contact as a rookie.  He would go down pretty easily too in the backfield.  Came back year 2 bigger and could shake that first contact.  That’s seems to be Hubbard’s biggest weakness a runner right now.  He can’t get away from that first contact yet…and the OL just isn’t good enough to stop that from being a regular occurrence at or behind the line.  
 


 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

I’m very confused. Chubba best asset is breaking it outside. He can’t power back, catch or block at this point. Why are people hating on him for the one thing he’s good at?

In college he could hit the hole inside and sprint, because he's a sprinter. Just so happens he has a better chance of finding a hole on the edges with our O-line. No clue why people are saying he doesn't have the speed. He's a couple ankle grabs away from some 30 yard runs. If my RB had 61 yards and a TD on 16 carries without a long run I'd keep running the ball 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...