Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would We Just Get Spanked Again?


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you asked me before we played Philly?  We would whoop their ass.  If you asked me now, after Philly?  They would curb stomp us.  

This coaching staff has a lot to prove after the poo they pulled the last two weeks and it being the culmination of all the issues they never resolved that have been ongoing since week 1.  The staff has to prove they're capable in the coming weeks, and a lot of it has to revolve around adjusting the OL and/or scheming around it...  otherwise, we won't have to worry about the playoffs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, pantherj said:

 

Word is spreading that Sam isn't much of a threat, and so we might be facing a lot of Cover-1, an other pass friendly defenses. The Cowboys I'm sure don't respect Sam, so Sam would have to come out and actually throw good deep balls, and go through his progressions like he has 20-20 vision.

We can beat the Cowboys, but not if Sam is Jets Sam again. No chance.

 He had 4 touchdowns against the Cowboys. This past Sunday was his first bad game and everyone is acting like he's been terrible all year. Stop this bullshit.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

 He had 4 touchdowns against the Cowboys. This past Sunday was his first bad game and everyone is acting like he's been terrible all year. Stop this bullshit.

definitely  won't be bullshit if he craps the bed  again vs the Vikings . Then we'd officially be in a tailspin 

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends. I think at the end of the season... hopefully... our OC will have adjusted and learned a lot from offensive woes coming from the beginning of the season. Hopefully the chemistry on the OL and just in the offense in general would be better at that time. Our defense is only gonna get better with Gilmore teaching/mentoring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KillerKat said:

 He had 4 touchdowns against the Cowboys. This past Sunday was his first bad game and everyone is acting like he's been terrible all year. Stop this bullshit.

5 turnovers in two games is a problem. He needs multiple big get right games the next couple of weeks to wash away the stain of the Eagles game. Idk what your standard is for a Panthers quarterback but that was one of the worst I've seen in years. Are you wanting another franchise qb or another Kyle Allen? I don't understand some of our fans it's like you have Stockholm syndrome. It's okay to expect better than league worst performances.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...