Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFLPA Smith want to look closer into hiring practices


Snake
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Call Me James said:

Not one bit. The head of the NFLPA has evidence that players are being overlooked or released due to factors outside of their ability to perform the job. This is one of his primary roles. 

What evidence is there of that? Just curious, the stuff I’ve heard about it is not evidence of that at all, but I’m not actively keeping up with everything. Also, based on the title of him wanting them to look into “hiring practices” that sounds like it has more to do with coaches and front office and other personnel rather than players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Squid Game said:

Kaepernick? 

 

34 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

What evidence is there of that? Just curious, the stuff I’ve heard about it is not evidence of that at all, but I’m not actively keeping up with everything. Also, based on the title of him wanting them to look into “hiring practices” that sounds like it has more to do with coaches and front office and other personnel rather than players.

This is all in response to Marquette King who was officially told he was release due to performance, but the emails suggest otherwise. 

 It's in the interest of the players and Smith to look into this. The NFLPA Is a labor union after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

 

This is all in response to Marquette King who was officially told he was release due to performance, but the emails suggest otherwise. 

 It's in the interest of the players and Smith to look into this. The NFLPA Is a labor union after all. 

King seemed to be an ass, the rare ego driven punter. Just about anything will be tolerated if the talent is elite. League has rapes, murders, domestic violence among other stuff thats just fine cause talent..... Bucs taking John off the ring of honor while employing ABrown is a total joke. Clown world has most of the power/control now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

 

This is all in response to Marquette King who was officially told he was release due to performance, but the emails suggest otherwise. 

 It's in the interest of the players and Smith to look into this. The NFLPA Is a labor union after all. 

It didn’t take King very long to find another team to pay him after the Raiders released him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Basbear said:

King seemed to be an ass, the rare ego driven punter. Just about anything will be tolerated if the talent is elite. League has rapes, murders, domestic violence among other stuff thats just fine cause talent..... Bucs taking John off the ring of honor while employing ABrown is a total joke. Clown world has most of the power/control now. 

💯 accurate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Basbear said:

King seemed to be an ass, the rare ego driven punter. Just about anything will be tolerated if the talent is elite. League has rapes, murders, domestic violence among other stuff thats just fine cause talent..... Bucs taking John off the ring of honor while employing ABrown is a total joke. Clown world has most of the power/control now. 

 Seems you're trying to justify why you're okay with it, but that's beside the point. That point being the NFLPA should take claims seriously if there's evidence that their agreement with the league on the how the firing of players should be handled isn't being properly carried out. 

6 minutes ago, Squid Game said:

It didn’t take King very long to find another team to pay him after the Raiders released him. 

That not relevant to claim nor the issue at hand. You're moving the goalposts. Your claim was initially that it was getting out of hand. I don't think you've made that point. 

 

Edited by Call Me James
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

 Seems you're trying to justify why you're okay with it, but that's beside the point. That point being the NFLPA should take claims seriously if there's evidence that their agreement with the league on the how the firing of players should be handled isn't being properly carried out. 

That not relevant to claim nor the issue at hand. You're moving the goalposts. Your claim was initially that it was getting out of hand. I don't think you've made that point. 

 

You said Smith is concern about other factors being reasons why players are overlooked or released. But how come plenty of guys who are felons are still giving chance after chance in this league just because they can perform on the field? Can’t change the narrative to fit what you want to only. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Call Me James said:

 Seems you're trying to justify why you're okay with it, but that's beside the point. That point being the NFLPA should take claims seriously if there's evidence that their agreement with the league on the how the firing of players should be handled isn't being properly carried out. 

That not relevant to claim nor the issue at hand. You're moving the goalposts. Your claim was initially that it was getting out of hand. I don't think you've made that point. 

 

King doesnt/didnt have the talent to over come his issues. In real life you have to be employable unless _______ . If King was a locker room cancer, being a punter is not the place to pull that. Short story- I was part of a sales team and we a had a Christmas party. Booze was flowing hard..... The #1 salesman had the great idea to go out to the front of the business and started throwing rocks/bottles/drinking glasses and the thousand+ $$$  windows. Two others joined laughing and only they only threw one bottle each at the sidewalks. Turns out he broke about 7 windows, a few drinking glasses, and miss-placed a few rocks........ Guess who got fired and guess who kept his job.....

Punters in total are +/- 8% of each other. So either headache and keep him or lose 3% and get a cheaper more calm employee. Steve Smith had this happen to him here at carolina.....and it was the right move as much as it pains me to agree.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Squid Game said:

You said Smith is concern about other factors being reasons why players are overlooked or released. But how come plenty of guys who are felons are still giving chance after chance in this league just because they can perform on the field? Can’t change the narrative to fit what you want to only. 

Each team is their own organization. If one organization isn't living up to the terms of the CBA then their is potentially a cause for grievance. 

Whether or not another team engages in that same behavior is a red herring sir.

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

King doesnt/didnt have the talent to over come his issues. In real life you have to be employable unless _______ . If King was a locker room cancer, being a punter is not the place to pull that. Short story- I was part of a sales team and we a had a Christmas party. Booze was flowing hard..... The #1 salesman had the great idea to go out to the front of the business and started throwing rocks/bottles/drinking glasses and the thousand+ $$$  windows. Two others joined laughing and only they only threw one bottle each at the sidewalks. Turns out he broke about 7 windows, a few drinking glasses, and miss-placed a few rocks........ Guess who got fired and guess who kept his job.....

Punters in total are +/- 8% of each other. So either headache and keep him or lose 3% and get a cheaper more calm employee. Steve Smith had this happen to him here at carolina.....and it was the right move as much as it pains me to agree.

He's was already an all pro punter when he was released and was still a top punter in the league. 

King was released in Denver due to injury, not because of this unrelated anecdotal story you're telling. 

Y'all need to seek help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...