Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule blames the D when asked about offensive struggles


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

"We couldn't control the line of scrimmage....couldn't protect the football...quarterback was under duress, couldn't make plays that we needed down in the red zone and all those areas to make touchdowns instead of field goals..."

That's just from his opening statement.  I watched his press conference yesterday.  He listed a litany of problems with the O thorough out the presser.

And yes, its still a team loss.

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

Hes not blaming the D, he's blaming the team as a whole.  it was a team loss... dont single any unit out.

 

4 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

We are reading into this way too hard. If the defense jumps on that ball in the end zone and doesnt try to scoop it, we win the game as well.

Just like special teams blocking to limit the punt block.
Just like Sam Darnold hitting Robby on the third down to help ice the game.
Just like Gonzalez pooching the ball with less leg strength
Just like the receivers catching the ball when it hits them in the hands
Just like Reddick and Burns sealing the edge

Seams like there were misses in ALL phases of the game.

Yeah, I'd have to say characterizing this as "blaming the defense" is a stretch.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Defense I know you guys have held the Eagles to their lowest yardage total of the season, turned them over multiple times. I know our offense has thrown 3 picks, and been virtually shut out in the 2nd half. And oops Special teams just had a punt blocked. 

I know why Rhule is doing this, but "C'mon Man"

Edited by Pantherxtreme
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care what he says in a presser.

But he better be raising hell in the coach's meeting room.

Our ST group is inferior, and that's mild.  Blackburn should be on notice.

I have no complaints about Snow's D -- they did their part to win the game.  Sure, if that bad snap is recovered for the TD it should have been, it's a different game.  But that ball was slippery, and it was just a bad break that it wasn't.  The D was trying to fall on it.

The elephant in the room that Rhule didn't acknowledge is his own timidity.  I only hope somebody mans up and points it out to him, or he looks in the mirror and sees his own errors in punting.

Lastly, he's got to get with his OC and plan and call a different style of play.  Passivity never gets it done in the NFL.  Go study those brass balls in Tepper's office.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

"We couldn't control the line of scrimmage....couldn't protect the football...quarterback was under duress, couldn't make plays that we needed down in the red zone and all those areas to make touchdowns instead of field goals..."

That's just from his opening statement.  I watched his press conference yesterday.  He listed a litany of problems with the O thorough out the presser.

And yes, its still a team loss.

 

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

Yeah, I'd have to say characterizing this as "blaming the defense" is a stretch.

I knew it had to be yet another poster cherry picking a quote and forming their own narrative. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense squandered so many drives including golden opportunities from the defense at critical times in the game. It doesn't really matter what he says in a presser but he needs to get a handle on this heading into our matchup with the Vikings. If this skid continues things could get rocky in the locker room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

The offense squandered so many drives including golden opportunities from the defense at critical times in the game. It doesn't really matter what he says in a presser but he needs to get a handle on this heading into our matchup with the Vikings. If this skid continues things could get rocky in the locker room.

The OL cant get beat up much more in the locker room than they have been on the field so far. I say let the guys on Defense beat the hell out of them. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...