Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please call Houston!!!


Panther51
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was hoping I would never have to make this post but it is obvious there is no way around. Darnold is a turnover machine on a good team or bad team and his accuracy leaves a lot to be desired. He is not answer. Ship him to Texans with a couple of 1st picks and maybe a defensive player to sweeten the deal. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnold was not under any duress when he made those 5 horrible picks last two weeks or the 5-7 throws that could have went for scores or kept drives going. Not on the line. He looks like a damn rookie. And yes the outcome would have been different with Watson and thankfully we do not have a owner who accepts mediocrity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Darnold was not under any duress when he made those 5 horrible picks last two weeks or the 5-7 throws that could have went for scores or kept drives going. Not on the line. He looks like a damn rookie. And yes the outcome would have been different with Watson and thankfully we do not have a owner who accepts mediocrity 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Russel Wilson has done well for years with less than adequate line. Line has never been a strength of Texans yet Watson has performed at high level. So exceptional QB play can mask deficiencies with your O line so I respectfully disagree. You could have the best line in the league and Darnold will still throw picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Oh, you mean a sex offender who would do no better behind our awful line?

Also for the record this kid deserves the presumption of innocence since he has not been convicted, charged or even suspended by league. Safe to say it ain’t gonna happen. Let’s give him the same presumption of innocence we gave the Commander in P grabber who had more accusations. If the grabber can lead the country and still flaunt plenty of power to this day I think Watson can QB the Carolina Panthers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...