Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JOE BRADY WILL NEVER BE A HEAD COACH!


BurnNChinn
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Terrible called game, we took one shot downfield in this game. GARBAGE, I wish he would have got a job in the off-season. Just Terrible!

Joe Brady doesn’t get to throw the ball.  

Brady’s overall scheme and playcalling are fine.    You can only do so much as a play caller.  Situationally he needs some work but as a 2nd year OC he is just fine.  

The OL and QB make or break playcalling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CRA said:

Joe Brady doesn’t get to throw the ball.  

Brady’s overall scheme and playcalling are fine.    You can only do so much as a play caller.  Situationally he needs some work but as a 2nd year OC he is just fine.  

The OL and QB make or break playcalling.  

Lol yeah ok, wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

Joe Brady doesn’t get to throw the ball.  

Brady’s overall scheme and playcalling are fine.    You can only do so much as a play caller.  Situationally he needs some work but as a 2nd year OC he is just fine.  

The OL and QB make or break playcalling.  

Dumb.

Lets run behind Paradis on 3rd and 2 or anything and short in critical situations!

Uh no its on Brady he knows the OL is poo and if he doesn't even better(worse)

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BurnNChinn said:

Lol yeah ok, wrong!

if you want to argue OL and QB play isn’t the most important thing in the NFL? Have at it.  

You can’t scheme and playcall around bad OL play paired with an average QB for 17 games.    Your talent issues will just get exposed eventually.   And who you play will have a lot to do with how that works out.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CRA said:

Joe Brady doesn’t get to throw the ball.  

Brady’s overall scheme and playcalling are fine.    You can only do so much as a play caller.  Situationally he needs some work but as a 2nd year OC he is just fine.  

The OL and QB make or break playcalling.  

Nah, you take all that into consideration calling plays. His second half adjustments are two steps behind… it just keeps happening.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...