Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Phil Snow interview..


Ivan The Awesome
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Theyll probably take the division and were up against TB.  Unless we win the division we very well could see them 1st rd.

I'd prefer it that way. I want to in as a Wild Card who "didn't belong" and I want to hear people say that we are playing a team that was in a higher class.

I want this team to prove to the world that we're coming in and taking over. 

It might not be this weekend ear that we go all the way, but it will be soon and the way this team is being put together and buying into what Rhule is doing, I think we stay for a while.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

I'd prefer it that way. I want to go back n as a Wild Card who "didn't belong" and I want to hear people say that we are playing a team that was in a higher class.

I want this team to prove to the world that we're coming in and taking over. 

It might not be this weekend ear that we go all the way, but it will be soon and the way this team is being put together and buying into what Rhule is doing, I think we stay for a while.

A 3-5 year run of sustained success, not just a winning record, but rings.  Conference/League but our version of the early Packers, 70’s Steelers, 80’s 49ers, 90’s Cowboys, 00’s Pats.

A mark on history.  Dominance.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Luciu5 said:

Eh, I'm a bit disappointed when they trotted 3 TE's and however many olineman, he couldn't put larger bodies on the field.  All I can think of is a lack of personnel to handle jumbo packages???  I know Yeet was out, but damn put Brown, Jones, Roy, Fox all on the field at once with some LB's that can cover the TE's.  I guess I just don't get the whole not being prepared for that.  I understand not practicing that, but damn at least through more weight at the problem.

Here's exactly what I'm talking about.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...