Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else got a bad feeling about this Eagles game?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

This is where I'm at. I'll watch and take whatever enjoyment I can from the games, but I have zero expectations going into them.

The only expectations I have is watching Sam's development and continued improvement as an NFL QB. 

And I definitely WILL enjoy watching the Defense absolutely FEAST!  😼

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't understand the thought that because the offensive line is bad, it means by default the backups are better. Is it possible? Yes, but who knows to what degree even if so. We legit might just have no solid offensive line options. The Norwell type situations aren't all that common, imo.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think they will be able to run on us. 

and I have never forgotten Fletcher Cox almost single handedly beating us after being a last minute activation that was hurt all week. 

I think we win.  I don’t think we will feel great after it.  But that’s also just how football is. 

 

First. If Johnson doesn't play, they will have 1 starter playing. They ain't running on us. Our D is going to feast yet again.

 

They have given up over 80 points the last 2 games. And teams are running all over them. So much so, that the Philly papers are asking if Cox is even playing? He has disappeared.

 

At home. This is a get right game. But that's how it's supposed to be.

 

Edit to add. Cox has had 2 games where he had 0 stats.

Edited by iamhubby1
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

I don't understand the thought that because the offensive line is bad, it means by default the backups are better. Is it possible? Yes, but who knows to what degree even if so. We legit might just have no solid offensive line options. The Norwell type situations aren't all that common, imo.

Think of it this way :  This is Brady's chance to basically keep Erving on the sidelines indefinitely if he plays well. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • If the red rifle can do the job and move the ball and keep the offense on the field, the defense may do a much better job. 
    • Baker is more athletic with a big arm.....plus he is not a shrimp. He just had to get his head on straight to succeed.
    • I considered that because someone else said the same thing. If you say 'I have to look at the tape" you are legitimizing the question of whether you are considering it. It gives it cred and the poo starts working its way down the wire that Canales says he is going to have to watch the tape, Bryce Young's career hanging by a thread etc etc you know how those fugers are. . At that moment he was the starter. End of story.  edit: to the benching question, he should have been sat down last year. That had to be Tepper. 
×
×
  • Create New...