Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is D Jack gone?


CarolinaXblue
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, MechaZain said:

The others are 6-10 years younger than Gilmore even if he's healthy I wouldn't be so quick to send anyone packing.

I don’t think Gilmore is putting him out personnel wise, but the 5.8 I think, million we’re paying him and D Jack is gonna want to get paid, rightfully so. I just don’t know if they’re going to spend it. And we don’t know if they’re done making trades for other players, adding to the cap budget. It’s tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scott12345 said:

I'm curious if they really feel like they are legit or if they are drinking their own koolaid.  Dallas certainly changed my perspective a bit, and I've put the kool-aid down for now.  I still think we can make a run at the playoffs, but I expect it to be a 1 and done deal.  Great feeling to get to the post season, but not actually make any noise.  Based on the Dallas game, we can't hang with the best if we can't play a complete game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This overstocked DB room is capital for Fit when draft time comes around.

Regardless of how much money we have, we aren’t going to have Jackson, Gilmore, Horn, Henderson, and Bouye.

Remember we still have Thomas-Oliver, Taylor, and Pride on rookie contracts.

Plus there is this strange love for Melvin and Hartsfield that I don’t get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

This overstocked DB room is capital for Fit when draft time comes around.

Regardless of how much money we have, we aren’t going to have Jackson, Gilmore, Horn, Henderson, and Bouye.

Remember we still have Thomas-Oliver, Taylor, and Pride on rookie contracts.

Plus there is this strange love for Melvin and Hartsfield that I don’t get.

This is where I’m at. I don’t feel like they’re going to keep Jackson. I don’t see how they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Cdparr7 said:

This overstocked DB room is capital for Fit when draft time comes around.

Regardless of how much money we have, we aren’t going to have Jackson, Gilmore, Horn, Henderson, and Bouye.

Remember we still have Thomas-Oliver, Taylor, and Pride on rookie contracts.

Plus there is this strange love for Melvin and Hartsfield that I don’t get.

Hartsfield has played as our NB, but I bet he moves full time to S now.

I doubt Bouye is here next year (nor Melvin) - so the other three guys are fighting for two spots. 

Assuming we keep Gilmore of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know I'm less concerned about Jackson and more questioning what does this move say about CJ?  He was a top 10 pick a year ago and should be a high end CB within a few weeks in our system, just like Horn.  I'm hoping this was just a good deal and not really reflective of anyone in particular on our roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

You know I'm less concerned about Jackson and more questioning what does this move say about CJ?  He was a top 10 pick a year ago and should be a high end CB within a few weeks in our system, just like Horn.  I'm hoping this was just a good deal and not really reflective of anyone in particular on our roster.

There's no way these are connected.  The staff couldn't possibly evaluate Henderson so poorly in the one week that he's been in the building to have buyer's remorse yet.  This is about being in on every deal and pulling the trigger on a great (albeit older and currently injured) player when we learned he could be had for only a future 6th round pick.  There's very little downside here.  Either gilmore plays well and we consider paying him (would depend on his contract demands and how we feel about his age as well as the same for DJ Jackson, since we may not be able to retain both--although it'd be nice to do so) or he doesn't and we move on.  If it's the latter, then we still have Horn and Henderson on their rookie deals and hopefully a resigned DJ Jackson. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

You know I'm less concerned about Jackson and more questioning what does this move say about CJ?  He was a top 10 pick a year ago and should be a high end CB within a few weeks in our system, just like Horn.  I'm hoping this was just a good deal and not really reflective of anyone in particular on our roster.

Gilmore is for the short term

Henderson is for the long term

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see them resigning DJax long term, no doubt. I can see Gillmore getting a nice 3 to 4 year deal (say 6-7 mil a year) or a nicer 1 to 2 year deal (8-10 mil a year). He's 31 and that's old in football years. They are not going to break the bank for him. And he wants to stay in NC as he lives here. This is perfect for his family and give the team 2 to 3 years to win a SB, he just might do favorable team deal to stay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching Rams/Eagles. Celebrating the St Louis Rams team that won the SB (Warner, Holt, etc..) while playing in Los Angeles seems wrong.  If I were in Los Angeles, no way I would attend a Rams game.  Probably wouldn't attend a Chargers game either.  Becoming a fan of a team that likes to move around just seems like a waste of energy as a fan.  
    • The only responses I am getting after providing statistics to put opinions in perspective seem to be from people who get angry and attack stats and people whose opinions differ from their own.  Have people on the Huddle ever overreacted, exaggerated, been wrong about players before?  Sure they have, so an alternative opinion with statistical support should not cause you to attack me or my views.  I am sorry your public schools failed you.  But your reactions are very revealing--you are stuck in Piaget's concrete operational stage--learn logic, how to debate a topic, and learn the difference between facts and emotional opinions.  When I paralleled Cam's stats with Jones' to point out how remarkably similar their careers have been to this point, It blew some 40 watt minds.  I think Jones, in a better situation, could be good--that should not upset you--
    • penalties and poor hands is what cost us in the RZ Bryce missing "high" in the back of the end zone is not an issue, you're taught as a QB to throw high in the back of end zone were only the receiver can catch or no one The duo of Ian Thomas and Tommy tremble can both go at the end of the season, both been here for multiple seasons and they've barely developed
×
×
  • Create New...