Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speed vs Power


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, L-TownCat said:

Thats what im saying.  Who else has the Personnel to attack us like Dallas did?

Without sitting down and looking at the rosters, I'm not certain. As mentioned above, NFL rules over the last several years have favored passing and I think most teams have built accordingly.

For what it's worth, that also means Dallas could be set up for a pretty good run because teams have been building their defenses to stop the pass. A good power running team might be able to tear through those defenses like tissue paper.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I do kinda wonder if Dallas having a successful run would kickstart a cycle shift though.

The NFL has always worked that way.

Eh...too hard to effectively go against the rules....consistently.

We kinda did the same thing with Double Trouble, ran roughshod over the NFL all the way to the NFCC only to get whipped by Jake.

End of the day, RB's take too much punishment to stay healthy, not many teams can have two "starters" on their rosters at that position, and certainly not many with a top flight WR corps, and a top 5 QB, along with a top 5 O Line.

Ravens kinda did the same thing 2 years ago, and are having a bear of a time replicating that level of consistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Truth be told, with the NFL rules being what they are, I don't know that many teams have emphasized power running.

It's valid that we'll be vulnerable to teams that can do it, but which teams are those?

Dallas gets away with it because the NFL allows them to hold and control speed rushers. That's why they always get killed in the playoffs. Either way we probably don't face another attack like that this year. My biggest fear is keeping Darnold up right not the power run game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Eh...too hard to effectively go against the rules....consistently.

We kinda did the same thing with Double Trouble, ran roughshod over the NFL all the way to the NFCC only to get whipped by Jake.

End of the day, RB's take too much punishment to stay healthy, not many teams can have two "starters" on their rosters at that position, and certainly not many with a top flight WR corps, and a top 5 QB, along with a top 5 O Line.

Ravens kinda did the same thing 2 years ago, and are having a bear of a time replicating that level of consistency.

It happens though. That's a "waiit and see" thing of course.

My bigger concern is that even if other teams aren't necessarily built to attack us that same way, we're still weak in the middle once you get past our defensive tackles.

Middle linebacker and safety aren't positions of strength for us right now. And although I'd love to add an "except for Chinn" disclaimer, I really don't feel like I can.

It's very possible that Chinn just needs more time to transition himself to a safety role, but the early returns haven't been great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Thats what im saying.  Who else has the Personnel to attack us like Dallas did?

I can answer that.

In addition to Dallas:  Arizona, LA Chargers, Philadelphia, Kansas City, Buffalo, LA Rams, Detroit, Baltimore, Denver, Tampa and Miami all average 3.0 YBC (yards before contact) or more when rushing.  This is a direct reflection of an offensive line just killing it at the point of attack. 

Here's the chart:

image.png.d538e727b54883a4db5455a79030fba6.png

Any team that gets it's back three yards before he is touched is a team that can blow you off the ball and likely can do what Dallas did.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...