Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Cowboys offensive line committed zero penalties

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I said during the game on a lot of those big runs they had you could clearly see somebody getting held as zeke ran by them. They even mentioned it on the broadcast, reddick got his head ripped off one play and derrick brown got strangled as well on another. Just another horribly officiated game. 

At some point you have to stop attributing it to ignorance.  They muddy the rules, hold no one accountable.  Make all the excuses and some how the big market team catches all the breaks while making zero mistakes.

This is the integrity im supposed to believe in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, GRWatcher said:

Is there a prize for the number of apology letters from the NFL? Rhule was livid most of the game. Maybe we should ask the Detroit Lions.

Apparently holding calls are falling into that "what is a catch" black hole. And NY wasn't paying attention to our game. 

Of course NY wasn't paying attention.

They were busy throwing a party because both their NY football teams won a game.  Yippee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shaqattaq Grand Master

shaqattaq

Posted
Posted
On 10/4/2021 at 6:14 AM, Scott12345 said:

Not a blame the ref guy, but this is absurd 

Agreed! I'm not even saying that we didn't get away with a few or that we 100% would have beaten them if some of those calls had been made. BUT, it was obvious that there was officiating bias towards Dallas.

I Mean Jeez, if there's a fumble, call it a fumble. They have to be reviewed anyway. The play before, when the ball was punched out, was reviewed, and not a fumble. Chinn clobbered that guy though. should have given us the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...