Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers lead at the half against Cowboys/Officials

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted (edited)

Refs are poo.

I also don’t believe Cowboys are overrated. They are actually good and we are just becoming a contending team in front of everyone’s eyes. Look at all the injuries and we still look great on D overall. We have one of the best coaching staffs in the league and it’s becoming clear to the mainstream. 
 

Win or not today, we are a team who can complete with the “playoff teams”

Edited by WarPanthers89
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted

 Carolina Passing
C/ATT    YDS    AVG    TD    INT    SACKS    RTG
Sam Darnold    12/16    114    7.1    0    0    3-21    94.3
TEAM    12/16    93    7.1    0    0    3-21    94.3
 Dallas Passing
C/ATT    YDS    AVG    TD    INT    SACKS    RTG
Dak Prescott    8/15    103    6.9    1    0    0-0    97.4
TEAM    8/15    103    6.9    1    0    0-0    97.4
 

Got to reverse those sack numbers in the 2nd half.

 

Officiating horrible!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted
Matchup car.png&h=100&w=100 dal.png&h=100&w=100
1st Downs 12 12
Passing 1st downs 5 6
Rushing 1st downs 7 5
1st downs from penalties 0 1
3rd down efficiency 4-6 2-6
4th down efficiency 0-0 1-1
Total Plays 33 31
Total Yards 166 204
Total Drives 5 5
Yards per Play 5.0 6.6
Passing 93 103
Comp-Att 12-16 8-15
Yards per pass 4.9 6.9
Interceptions thrown 0 0
Sacks-Yards Lost 3-21 0-0
Rushing 73 101
Rushing Attempts 14 16
Yards per rush 5.2 6.3
Red Zone (Made-Att) 2-2 2-2
Penalties 3-12 3-20
Turnovers 0 0
Fumbles lost 0 0
Interceptions thrown 0 0
Defensive / Special Teams TDs 0 0
Possession 16:51 13:09

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Castavar Grand Master

Castavar

Posted
Posted

That "forward progression" play was one of the WORSE calls I've ever seen. How is a bang bang tackle INSTANTLY called dead? So you're telling me they literally called that play dead in a millisecond, because that's how fast that play happened. Screwed us out of a fumble and should be up 14-7 right now.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...