Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some insights on the CJ Henderson trade…


*FreeFua*
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Clicheking said:

Hadn't heard that story. Started researching it a little bit, seems like it was done as way to embarrass him??

"In another unusual development, the Jaguars had Henderson ride a stationary bike in front of his teammates in the back of the end zone. Usually, when a player rides a stationary bike during practice, they are off to the side and a reasonable distance from the practice action."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.jacksonville.com/amp/5536689001

Yeah that's just fuggin weird. Definitely sounds like they were trying to make Henderson an example for something. That's not professional at all. Urban Meyer is a fuggin joke.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

Lol, speaking of Urban Meyer. He may not be married much longer. Dude was trending on Twitter all night lmao. 

 Lol Imagine seeing your coach after a loss at a bar being grinded on by some random woman instead of looking over film trying to get your team better.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Tbe said:

Makes me wonder if they would have gone QB or OL in the first if they got him.

QB no. We never had any intention of drafting a QB at 8. None. That's why we tried to get Stafford and then we got Darnold. Once we got Darnold he was going to be our QB this season and that is perfectly clear to me. They never had a QB on their board in the first that I've seen nor heard about. Maybe an OL but I doubt it. I believe we would have drafted Horn and we would have them both just as we do now. Having 2 big, man coverage corners is what this defense is built for. I can't wait to see what we look like with 2 shutdown corners on the field at the same time. Horn was already showing that he is and I believe this staff will have Henderson doing the same sooner rather than later.  

Edited by Panthers Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, L-TownCat said:

Have you seen DJ in run support this year?  Dude is ballin’ outta control.

Only cause it's a contract year. Dude wants to be able to do thisscrooge mcduck 80s GIF and I can't blame him. That said, thankfully I'm not the one that had to sign him to a new contract and trust he'll keep the effort up when he didn't show the same effort in previous years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

Or that this is a completely new defensive scheme and it fits him better? Sometimes asking players to do what they're good at makes a huge difference. Just look at Reddick. How many sacks does he have already?

Reddick is a bad choice for your argument since he had over 12 sacks last year. Arizona seemed to wonder if Reddick was a one year wonder and didn't make a good or any effort to resign him. So far he has proven that he is not a one year wonder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Panthers Rhule said:

QB no. We never had any intention of drafting a QB at 8. None. That's why we tried to get Stafford and then we got Darnold. Once we got Darnold he was going to be our QB this season and that is perfectly clear to me. They never had a QB on their board in the first that I've seen nor heard about. Maybe an OL but I doubt it. I believe we would have drafted Horn and we would have them both just as we do now. Having 2 big, man coverage corners is what this defense is built for. I can't wait to see what we look like with 2 shutdown corners on the field at the same time. Horn was already showing that he is and I believe this staff will have Henderson doing the same sooner rather than later.  

Agree on the QB but I do think we'd have taken Sewell had he dropped.

Heck, that was probably true anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Reddick is a bad choice for your argument since he had over 12 sacks last year. Arizona seemed to wonder if Reddick was a one year wonder and didn't make a good or any effort to resign him. So far he has proven that he is not a one year wonder.

Not really because last year they used him in much the same we are now. BEFORE last year he was considered a bust when they weren't playing him to his strengths. Also, this season he has 4.5 sacks after 3 games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

Yeah Meyer will be out in 2 years tops, clearly can´t adjust to the NFL level and clearly not a player-friendly coach.

Meyer reminds me of Jim Harbaugh in that regard, i.e. guy who does better communicating with young kids than professional adults.

Mind you, Harbaugh's been undermining that idea since going to Michigan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...