Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Cowboys - What do you know?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Monrowed said:

I think that you are interjecting your thoughts around my comments. No where did I say that it would be a sole reason for a win or a loss. I was just alluding to the fact that the Panthers need to play a clean game as I do not expect them to get many calls that benefit them.
Judging by the way that you were triggered I would suspect that you are a Dallas fan.

 

Triggered by asking a question???  Cmon lil guy I was just making a point that the league does not favor one team over the 31 other teams.  If that was the case, they would have "reffed" them into more Superbowls over the course of the last 25 years.  I was just addressing the fans here who are "Triggered" by their own excuses in case of a loss.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RumHam said:

fug the cowboys but we about to be brought back to reality. 

Panthers are a tough team, so I wouldn't say that.  Too bad McCaffrey couldn't play because I dont think Dallas has the personel to keep him contained.  Even without McCaffrey, I think Panthers still win this one.  Turnovers will be a killer for either team.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Fug Drump said:

 

Triggered by asking a question???  Cmon lil guy I was just making a point that the league does not favor one team over the 31 other teams.  If that was the case, they would have "reffed" them into more Superbowls over the course of the last 25 years.  I was just addressing the fans here who are "Triggered" by their own excuses in case of a loss.

Apparently, you are triggered… 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Monrowed said:

Apparently, you are triggered… 

 

Actually you are triggered by tossing out the only reasons the Panthers could lose.  Thats loser talk.  Losers get triggered by poo like baseless claims that the NFL and refs would favor one team out of 31 others to somehow manipulate a game in their favor.   That's just dumb....  but apparently a ref triggered you along your football fandom journey.  You should see someone about that.  That mindset over imaginary things isn't healthy. 

  • Poo 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fug Drump said:

 

Actually you are triggered by tossing out the only reasons the Panthers could lose.  Thats loser talk.  Losers get triggered by poo like baseless claims that the NFL and refs would favor one team out of 31 others to somehow manipulate a game in their favor.   That's just dumb....  but apparently a ref triggered you along your football fandom journey.  You should see someone about that.  That mindset over imaginary things isn't healthy. 

So every game is equal and there is never an ounce of bias on the behalf of the officials?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Fug Drump said:

What do politics have to do with this discussion about a solid Cowboys team going against a very very good Panthers team???  Stick to the topic. 

It should be a good game, it would be even better with both teams 100% healthy but it is what it is. We still have our pass rushers and they are going to have to fight through the holds and put Dak on his ass. 

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Fug Drump said:

Panthers are a tough team, so I wouldn't say that.  Too bad McCaffrey couldn't play because I dont think Dallas has the personel to keep him contained.  Even without McCaffrey, I think Panthers still win this one.  Turnovers will be a killer for either team.

I mean, I'm in Texas.  Where do you wanna meet up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He made some excellent throws but he always has made some excellent throws here and there. I don't know what to think, which is what I was apprehensive about. Is he going to have a decent downfield game? Because okay Legette dropped one, but someone was giving stats prior to the bye or during it where he had two downfield completions and one of them was the jump ball that is just launched and fingers are crossed that our guy comes down with it, and yesterday we saw that again. The Russell Wilson school of downfield passing.  I don't feel like that is sustainable, but at the same time you have to do Something to make the defense understand they have to defend that downfield throws. Like i said, confused.  I guess I'm going to review the game for myself and look closely at his mechanics and stuff because if he actually fixed that stuff it explains the better throws. And that has been my biggest objection, or what I see as the thing that makes or breaks his chances, that unorthodox dropback and tippy toe action and not having his feet set which limits velocity etc etc. 
    • The negative Nancy in me (or objective?) says that they had a bye week to prepare for the Chiefs. However, it’s one thing to have a good plan and it’s another to actually execute it. For all the flack he’s received (from me as well), Bryce seemingly has put his head down and worked his tail off and his play is giving me hope. The first 18-game Bryce showed no progression whatsoever. He gets benched, comes back, and has shown steady progress every week he has started. I think I’m starting to see what the Bryce lovers and unconditional defenders were saying all along, and I hope he can show that on a regular basis for the sake of our QB1 position. 
    • Yeah, we could still very well end up 4-13 with the 2nd pick.   I think LVR has the inside track for 1, with only a JAX team as a team on docket that could be beatable.    
×
×
  • Create New...