Next year's 1st for Laremy Tunsil who says no?

[BlackPanther21_]

4 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Is he on the trade block because if not we basically have our pick at any player in the NFL in this scenario and so I would say no and go for Mahomes.

Woah, really? What do you think would get the deal done? Maybe... Jackson, Thomas, and our 2023 2nd?

[jb2288]

30 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Tell me why my idea is bad instead of just telling me it's a bad idea 

Because his contract sucks. Would rather draft a LT with our first or turn it into replacing our lost 2nd for Darnold

[Floppin]

6 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Anyone who does not realize that Guard is our weakest position on the line, is not a full time fan. 

Guard or center. Paradise isn't a great blocker by any stretch and I don't think he does a great job of calling protections either honestly, at least not well enough to justify his liability as a blocker.

Edited September 24, 2021 by Floppin

[Beast_3000]

34 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Tell me why my idea is bad instead of just telling me it's a bad idea 

While Tunsil would be a huge upgrade our problem is more so up the middle at center and left guard. In addition we have tons of salary cap space but we have some of out top players (Burns & Moore ) due for extensions. If Darnold continues ar his current trajectory he will also need to be renewed. 

[TheBigKat]

53 minutes ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Now that we've got this Texans game out of the way they should have no reason to want to withhold him from us if given the right offer.

He was tossing Brian burns around last night like he was a ragdoll. We are 31st in pass block rating in the NFL.  Perfect storm? 

If we're just going to draft a tackle next year anyway I don't see why not...

this is why I voted NO for the internet pipeline to Gastonia

[Chiefzack]

I think a LT trade is more likely then people realize.

If we're at the trade deadline 1-2 games ahead of tampa with 1-2 losses, I feel we at least make an effort to fix the line.

Assuming darnold stays on track, he's worth 3 1sts on his own, we can afford to lose one, plus it would be a crap 1st anyway if we're playoff bound

[RIPTreyLance]

4 minutes ago, Chiefzack said:

I think a LT trade is more likely then people realize.

If we're at the trade deadline 1-2 games ahead of tampa with 1-2 losses, I feel we at least make an effort to fix the line.

Assuming darnold stays on track, he's worth 3 1sts on his own, we can afford to lose one, plus it would be a crap 1st anyway if we're playoff bound

Exactly. It's a calculated decision 

[mbarbour21]

I don’t think they will part with him. Their rebuild ain’t to far off considering that division IMO. And I don’t think we should. We draft really well. I would focus on o-line in the draft and get some lineman at a rookie rate. We got some contracts to dish out soon.

[4Corners]

1 hour ago, RIPTreyLance said:

Tell me why my idea is bad instead of just telling me it's a bad idea 

Your idea is bad because you thought it up 

[TrevorLaurenceTime22]

No.

[FattyFatFat]

We need a center just as bad as we need LT 

[Jon Snow]

Price is too expensive.  In Fittererererrrrer I trust.

[Moo Daeng]

I say no

[Moo Daeng]

4 minutes ago, FattyFatFat said:

We need a center just as bad as we need LT 

Not nearly